Re: [NTG-context] MP: problem connecting paths.

Dear Mikael, > Le 20 déc. 2021 à 12:14, Mikael Sundqvist a écrit : > > Hi, > > I will try again. What if you do > > newcircleA := newcircleA scrutinized 2; > > after your definition of newcircleA? Once I understood I had to compile with LMTX, this works like magic ! I spent hours to find a

Re: [NTG-context] MP: problem connecting paths.

Hi, I will try again. What if you do newcircleA := newcircleA scrutinized 2; after your definition of newcircleA? /Mikael On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 3:45 PM Fabrice L wrote: > > Thanks Mikael, > > Le 20 déc. 2021 à 02:21, Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context > a écrit : > > Hi, > > would it be

Re: [NTG-context] MP: problem connecting paths.

Thanks Mikael,Le 20 déc. 2021 à 02:21, Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context a écrit :Hi,would it be an option for you to donewcircleA := circleA cutbefore P1 cutafter P2 -- cycle ;In that case you avoid extra points.You are right, in this simple case, your solution avoid the

Re: [NTG-context] MP: problem connecting paths.

Hi, would it be an option for you to do newcircleA := circleA cutbefore P1 cutafter P2 -- cycle ; In that case you avoid extra points. /Mikael On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 5:30 AM Fabrice L via ntg-context wrote: > > Dear list, > > I have a problem connecting path with the operator « & » (page 16

[NTG-context] MP: problem connecting paths.

Dear list, I have a problem connecting path with the operator « & » (page 16 Metafun manual). The problem is illustrated by the code (and the joined PDF) which follows. I draw random cycled forms (left part of the figure) and when they interact, they are modified to « fit together » (right