[NTG-context] Math fractions

Something is wrong in the current implmentation of \tfrac. If we take away all the bells and whistles provided by \definemathfraction, * \tfrac#1#2 should be equal to {\textstyle #2 \over #1} * \dfrac#1#2 should be equal to {\displaystyle #2 \over #1} * \frac should be equal to \tfrac in

[NTG-context] math fractions

Hi, Does anyone have a suggestion to generate a better result for the symmetry specification: \starttext ${2\over a}{2\over b}{2\over m}$ \stoptext I tried: \starttext ${2\over \vphantom{b}a}{2\over \vphantom{b}b}{2\over \vphantom{b}m}$ \stoptext but this leaves too much vertical space -

Re: [NTG-context] math fractions

Alan BRASLAU 4. November 2015 um 17:50 Hi, Does anyone have a suggestion to generate a better result for the symmetry specification: \starttext ${2\over a}{2\over b}{2\over m}$ \stoptext I tried: \starttext ${2\over \vphantom{b}a}{2\over \vphantom{b}b}{2\over

Re: [NTG-context] math fractions

Thank you, Wolfgang. I had stopped using the \frac command a while ago as it was *seriously broken*, previously. Why, however, does the TeX construction {a\over b} not work correctly, and more precisely, why does the TeX command \vphantom{b} not give the desired result? Alan On Wed, 4 Nov