Re: [NTG-context] Minimals and latest luatex on linux-64

2008-10-02 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
Hello, > Actually luatex is broken on the garden also. A simple test file gives The problem is fixed on the Garden. Thanks to Aditya for reporting it :-) Arthur ___ If your question is of interest

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals and latest luatex on linux-64

2008-10-01 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, Peter Münster wrote: On Wed, Oct 01 2008, Aditya Mahajan wrote: The minimals still have LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.29.0-2008072108. Excuse me, I did not see that 'svn ci -F "$BUILDDIR/VERSIONS.tmp"' had failed 2 days ago (network down), when I ran the build-binaries.sh sc

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals and latest luatex on linux-64

2008-10-01 Thread Peter Münster
On Wed, Oct 01 2008, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > The minimals still have LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.29.0-2008072108. Excuse me, I did not see that 'svn ci -F "$BUILDDIR/VERSIONS.tmp"' had failed 2 days ago (network down), when I ran the build-binaries.sh script... Now luatex is updated to 0.30.0. C

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals and latest luatex on linux-64

2008-10-01 Thread Aditya Mahajan
Actually luatex is broken on the garden also. A simple test file gives ! LuaTeX error .../context/current/texmf/tex/context/base/font-def.lua:684: attempt to call field 'definefont' (a nil value) stack traceback: .../context/current/texmf/tex/context/base/font-def.lua:684: in function '

[NTG-context] Minimals and latest luatex on linux-64

2008-10-01 Thread Aditya Mahajan
Hi, The minimals still have LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.29.0-2008072108. With the latest minimals, I get the following error ! LuaTeX error ...tyam/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/font-def.lua:684: attempt to call field 'definefont' (a nil value) stack traceback: ...tyam/tex/texmf-co