On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 03:18:31PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 24-4-2011 12:32, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 12:11:15AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> >>On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:57:55PM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> >>>See the attached file, it is broken for all OTF fonts; the it
On 24-4-2011 12:32, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 12:11:15AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:57:55PM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
See the attached file, it is broken for all OTF fonts; the italic
correction is used the wrong way (added to width while it should
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 12:11:15AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:57:55PM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> > See the attached file, it is broken for all OTF fonts; the italic
> > correction is used the wrong way (added to width while it should be
> > subtracted from it). It see
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:57:55PM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> See the attached file, it is broken for all OTF fonts; the italic
> correction is used the wrong way (added to width while it should be
> subtracted from it). It seems to be a ConTeXt issue (testing with same
> luatex binary but with T
See the attached file, it is broken for all OTF fonts; the italic
correction is used the wrong way (added to width while it should be
subtracted from it). It seems to be a ConTeXt issue (testing with same
luatex binary but with TeXLive ConTeXt gives correct output).
Regards,
Khaled
--
Khaled H