Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. 6. August 2015 17:41 Hello Otared, thanks for the hint. However, I'm still not able to tune the numbering setup fully. Now I have (with resulting numbers | desired number): \setuphead[part,chapter][placehead=yes,page=no] \se

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Hello Otared, thanks for the hint. However, I'm still not able to tune the numbering setup fully. Now I have (with resulting numbers | desired number): \setuphead[part,chapter][placehead=yes,page=no] \setupformulas [prefix=yes, %prefix=no, %prefixsegments=chapter:section, pref

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Hi Lukás, You configure the way the equations are numbered by sayng (for example) \setupformulas[prefix=yes, prefixsegments=chapter:section, way=bysection, location=right] If you say « prefix= no » then you don’t need the other specifications, but I am giving a more example above in ca

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Hello, one more question related to the numbering style. The code bellow: \def\fakeformula{a^2 + b^2 = c^2} \starttext \chapter{Cha1} \section{A} \placeformula\startformula\fakeformula\stopformula \section{B} \placeformula\startformula\fakeformula\stopformula

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Hi Wolfgang, Thanks for having solved the problem with subformulas numbering. I would just make a comment on your answers to Lukás, regarding the use of \startsubformulas[mylabel] Indeed using this structure instead of \startsubformulas[+] allows one to refer to all the sub-form

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Hello, great, thanks for explanation! Best regards, Lukas On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 12:07:18 +0200, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: One difference between \startsubformulas[+] and \startsubformulas[label] is that the second method creates a label which can be used to refer to the number of the formula

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. 6. August 2015 11:32 Hello Wolfgang, thank you for the patch (not in today's beta); I also attach the modified strc-mat.mkiv and a test file. Two questions: 1. What exactly are %\startsubformulas[+] % These two options f

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Hello Wolfgang, thank you for the patch (not in today's beta); I also attach the modified strc-mat.mkiv and a test file. Two questions: 1. What exactly are %\startsubformulas[+] % These two options for \subformulas %\startsubformulas[mylabel] % enable subnumbers for the formulas i

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Aditya Mahajan 4. August 2015 02:08 On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote: I am not sure when the subformula numbering broke, but I can confirm that it is not working with the latest beta. You have to make three changes in strc-mat.mkiv to

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote: So, finally, what is the PROPER way (if it really exists) in ConTeXt how to typeset subformulas? I am not sure when the subformula numbering broke, but I can confirm that it is not working with the latest beta. @Hans, what wi

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Hello, some more observation: It seems (sub)numbering (sub)formulas can be achieved enclosing expressions into \start/\stop-align. I wrote a code based on a test suite file: ...\test\doc\context\tests\mkiv\math\formulas-001.tex \starttext \startsubformulas[eq:sub1] \plac

[NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Hello, it seems this is a frequent thesis - in the mailing archive, stackoverflow... Anyway, I'm not able to find a valid way (MWE) how to number subformulas (with option to create a reference name, like 'eq:1a' and 'eq:1b', and to be able to refer to them, like "\ineq[eq:1a] and \ineq[eq:1b]"

[NTG-context] Numbering subformulas broken?

Hello, the following example (based on http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math/Display#Automatic_Sub-Formula_Numbering ): \starttext \startsubformulas[eq:1] \placeformula[eq:1a] \startformula c^2 = a^2 + b^2 \stopformula \placeformula[eq:1b] \startformula

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

On 15-10-2012 16:58, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 15.10.2012 um 13:45 schrieb Otared Kavian : Hi Andreas, Wolfgang and Aditya, Thanks for your attention and suggesting a fix. However, after I applied the change mentioned by Andreas for the definition of \strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbe

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Am 15.10.2012 um 13:45 schrieb Otared Kavian : > Hi Andreas, Wolfgang and Aditya, > > Thanks for your attention and suggesting a fix. > However, after I applied the change mentioned by Andreas for the definition > of >\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering > in cont-new.mkiv and made the

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

On 15-10-2012 13:45, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Andreas, Wolfgang and Aditya, Thanks for your attention and suggesting a fix. However, after I applied the change mentioned by Andreas for the definition of \strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering in cont-new.mkiv and made the formats anew, the s

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Hi Andreas, Wolfgang and Aditya, Thanks for your attention and suggesting a fix. However, after I applied the change mentioned by Andreas for the definition of \strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering in cont-new.mkiv and made the formats anew, the subformulas are not numbered as expected.

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Dear all, Dear Wolfgang, > This is already in the core (str-mat.mkiv) but I found a typo in another > macro in font-new.mkiv Thanks. That's indeed interesting. I still get an error. I have deleted everything and have updated to the most recent beta: 2012.10.06 15:31 MKIV fmt: 2012.10.15 I

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Am 14.10.2012 um 22:25 schrieb Andreas Mang : > Hi there, > > I suppose the following fixes your problem though I can not tell for sure, > since you did not provide the error message: > > Replace the stuff connected to > > \strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering > > in > > cont-new.mkiv > >

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Hi there, I suppose the following fixes your problem though I can not tell for sure, since you did not provide the error message: Replace the stuff connected to \strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering in cont-new.mkiv with \def\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering {\let\strc_formulas_handle_

Re: [NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

On Sun, 14 Oct 2012, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Aditya, It seems that numbering subformulas as described in your « My Way » magazine entitled « Using \startalign » does not work with mkiv. The following minimal example taken from page 6 of the above mentioned manual, does not result in what is

[NTG-context] Numbering subformulas

Hi Aditya, It seems that numbering subformulas as described in your « My Way » magazine entitled « Using \startalign » does not work with mkiv. The following minimal example taken from page 6 of the above mentioned manual, does not result in what is described there: \starttext \placesubformula