Aditya Mahajan wrote on Friday, October 23, 2009 10:41 PM:
The above solution was for MkIV. For completeness, this is how you
will do
the same with MkII. I don't know how to get the page numbers correct
in
the TOC in this case.
I get correct MkII pagenumbers with this:
%% MkII:
21, 2009 12:37 AM
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: [NTG-context] Page Numbering Hell
All-
A few days ago when I first stumbled on ConTeXt I was very, very
excited. I have some 500 pages of technical documentation that could
benefit from this, particularly since I need Japanese font support
, 2009 9:49 AM
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Page Numbering Hell
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Bryant Eastham wrote:
1. Is Mark IV real? I am only somewhat joking here - after
spending hours searching for reasonable documentation on even the most
trivial options, I am
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Bryant Eastham
beast...@pewla.us.pewg.panasonic.com wrote:
Thomas, all:
It appears that not all of the messages have been delivered in a timely
manner - I just received quite a few. I suppose that is why you reference the
reply I got (or didn't until just
On Friday 23 October 2009 10:30:09 Bryant Eastham wrote:
Yes, I had looked at all the examples that I could find, I had checked the
many references, and could not find documentation on most of the routines
that current postings seem to indicate should be used. With the further
pointers I
BoĊĦtjan Vesnicer wrote:
for me it is actually very obvious an easy to understand the situation
about missing documentation. In my opinion there are a couple of
reasons for that:
- The gurus don't have time to write the documentation since they have
more important things to do, i.e. implementing
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 18:52:21 Bryant Eastham wrote:
1. Should I use mkii or mkiv? If mkii, then what should I plan on as
schedule for upgrading?
I asked this question recently and was told that it was
probably pretty safe now to use mkiv, as the developers
use mkiv themselves.
My
All-
A few days ago when I first stumbled on ConTeXt I was very, very
excited. I have some 500 pages of technical documentation that could
benefit from this, particularly since I need Japanese font support. But
it has to be real.
I'm sorry if this sounds caustic, but after 12 hours of
Dear Bryant,
Your post is slightly exaggerated.
The document structure that you want to produce
appears to be relatively standard. Whereas,
indeed, the learning curve for ConTeXt (as for TeX)
can be somewhat slow, the richness and powerfulness
is well worth the effort.
The documentation for
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Alan BRASLAU alan.bras...@cea.fr wrote:
\starttext
\startfrontmatter
\completecontent
\stopfrontmatter
\startbodymatter
\chapter{Chapter}
\section{Section}
\chapter{Chapter 2}
\section{Section}
\stopbodymatter
\stoptext
only slightly different,
10 matches
Mail list logo
