[NTG-context] Q about hangaround commands

2010-10-25 Thread Vladimir Lomov
Hi. I'm trying to figure out the limitation of \start/stophangaround commands. 1. Is it correct that currently the figure could be placed only on left? If so is it easy to extend the command to allow placing figure at right side? 2. Is there way to increase/decrease the space between the text and

Re: [NTG-context] Q about hangaround commands

2010-11-02 Thread Vladimir Lomov
Hi. Some answers I found myself :) 2010/10/26 Vladimir Lomov : > Hi. > > I'm trying to figure out the limitation of \start/stophangaround commands. > > 1. Is it correct that currently the figure could be placed only on > left? If so is it easy to extend the command to allow placing figure > at ri

Re: [NTG-context] Q about hangaround commands

2010-11-02 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 03.11.2010 um 05:47 schrieb Vladimir Lomov: > Hi. > > Some answers I found myself :) > > P.S. I have feeling that feature like 'hangaround' doesn't fit well > with tex (page layout ...?) model. Hangaround is a very robust command and works in more cases than \placefigure[left] but you have

Re: [NTG-context] Q about hangaround commands

2010-11-03 Thread Vladimir Lomov
Hello Wolfgang. 2010/11/3 Wolfgang Schuster : > > Am 03.11.2010 um 05:47 schrieb Vladimir Lomov: > >> Hi. >> >> Some answers I found myself :) >> >> P.S. I have feeling that feature like 'hangaround' doesn't fit well >> with tex (page layout ...?) model. > \unprotect > > \def\stophangaround >  {\

Re: [NTG-context] Q about hangaround commands

2012-12-06 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Wolfgang Schuster < schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Am 03.11.2010 um 05:47 schrieb Vladimir Lomov: > > > Hi. > > > > Some answers I found myself :) > > > > P.S. I have feeling that feature like 'hangaround' doesn't fit well > > with tex (page layout ...

Re: [NTG-context] Q about hangaround commands

2012-12-06 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Mikael, The example given by Wolfgang works fine for me with mkii, but not in mkiv: probably something has changed in mkiv, for example the way [scale=500] must be used in mkiv. Best regards: OK On 6 déc. 2012, at 10:58, "Mikael P. Sundqvist" wrote: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Wolfg

Re: [NTG-context] Q about hangaround commands

2012-12-06 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Otared Kavian wrote: > Hi Mikael, > > The example given by Wolfgang works fine for me with mkii, but not in > mkiv: probably something has changed in mkiv, for example the way > [scale=500] must be used in mkiv. > > Best regards: OK > > On 6 déc. 2012, at 10:58, "

Re: [NTG-context] Q about hangaround commands

2012-12-06 Thread Hans Hagen
On 12/6/2012 10:58 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Wolfgang Schuster mailto:schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com>> wrote: Am 03.11.2010 um 05:47 schrieb Vladimir Lomov: > Hi. > > Some answers I found myself :) > > P.S. I have feeling that

Re: [NTG-context] Q about hangaround commands

2012-12-06 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 06.12.2012 um 11:44 schrieb Otared Kavian : > Hi Mikael, > > The example given by Wolfgang works fine for me with mkii, but not in mkiv: > probably something has changed in mkiv, for example the way [scale=500] must > be used in mkiv. The definitions of commands/environments have changed i

Re: [NTG-context] Q about hangaround commands

2012-12-06 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, I combined some functionality into: \showframe \starttext \starthanging{\externalfigure[cow][scale=500]} \input tufte \stophanging \blank \starthanging[right]{\externalfigure[cow][scale=500]} \input tufte \stophanging \blank \starthanging[location=right,n=2,distance=1cm]{\exter