Hello,
Nagy Bence wrote:
- how about ConTeXt future (why it is not open source?)
It is open source, even free software. You can go ahead and change
everything yourself. Pragma ADE has licenced this impressive and
valuable macro package under the terms of the GNU Public License
(GPL)! This is
> > - how about ConTeXt future (why it is not open source?)
>
> It is open source, even free software. You can go ahead and change
> everything yourself. Pragma ADE has licenced this impressive and
> valuable macro package under the terms of the GNU Public License
> (GPL)! This is really great! (S
Hi,
> Also, this could be the url for hight level FAQ
> (this forum it not realy a hight level forum!)
Go ahead and put it in the wiki! Its up to us all to put content in
there.
> - how about ConTeXt future (why it is not open source?)
It is open source, even free software. You can go ahead a
Hi,
> the idea of the keywords is very nice...
> in
> http://wiki.tcl.tk
> you can search for a specific page using the url
> http://wiki.tcl.tk/file
>
> even more, you can search all pages containing a word like in:
>
> http://wiki.tcl.tk/menu*
But this is not a pure keyword serach. This is just
Le 23 juin 04, à 16:54, Patrick Gundlach a écrit :
Hi Maurice,
texshow-web: http://members.ping.de:8061
ConTeXt wiki: http://members.ping.de:8062
Not accessible!
Perhaps because I'm behind a firewall? I should try at home.
I just double checked that the services both run ok. If there is any
proble
Hello,
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
> >> >> [starting ConTeXt wiki at] http://members.ping.de:8062/
> >> What kind of example documents do you think of? I guess that you know
> >> that the magazines on the main ConTeXt site have their source code
> >> included?
> > I was thinking o
Hi,
> But as Open Source, I also (by mistake) mean a SourceForge projet
> from which:
> - an **unique** starting URL.
www.pragma-ade.com
> - dated version would be available,
http://www.pragma-ade.com/download.htm
> - current official documentation (I didn't mean
> "documentationsss"
Hi Maurice,
>> texshow-web: http://members.ping.de:8061
>> ConTeXt wiki: http://members.ping.de:8062
>
> Not accessible!
> Perhaps because I'm behind a firewall? I should try at home.
I just double checked that the services both run ok. If there is any
problem that could be on my side, please te
Le 23 juin 04, à 10:56, Patrick Gundlach a écrit :
Also, this could be the url for hight level FAQ
(this forum it not realy a hight level forum!)
Go ahead and put it in the wiki! Its up to us all to put content in
there.
...
texshow-web: http://members.ping.de:8061
ConTeXt wiki: http://members.pin
Le 23 juin 04, à 10:51, Tobias Burnus a écrit :
Maurice Diamantin wrote:
- how about ConTeXt future (why it is not open source?)
Well, ConTeXt is regarded as opensource.
OK, probably I looked at this file too long ago.
I agree ConTeXt is now Open source.
But as Open Source, I also (by mistake) mean
Hi,
> Also, this could be the url for hight level FAQ
> (this forum it not realy a hight level forum!)
Go ahead and put it in the wiki! Its up to us all to put content in
there.
> - how about ConTeXt future (why it is not open source?)
It is open source, even free software. You can go ahead a
Hi,
> the idea of the keywords is very nice...
> in
> http://wiki.tcl.tk
> you can search for a specific page using the url
> http://wiki.tcl.tk/file
>
> even more, you can search all pages containing a word like in:
>
> http://wiki.tcl.tk/menu*
But this is not a pure keyword serach. This is just
Hello,
Maurice Diamantin wrote:
- how about ConTeXt future (why it is not open source?)
Well, ConTeXt is regarded as opensource. The last time I read the
licence it looked pretty free. In how far do you think should ConTeXt
become more "open source"? BSD licence without advertising clause? LGPL?
Le 22 juin 04, à 19:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
the idea of the keywords is very nice...
in
http://wiki.tcl.tk
you can search for a specific page using the url
yes! it's the best exemple I know about!
No need to define a strict hierchical structure.
Also, this could be the url for hight level
Hi all,
the idea of the keywords is very nice...
in
http://wiki.tcl.tk
you can search for a specific page using the url
like in
http://wiki.tcl.tk/file
even more, you can search all pages containing a word like in:
http://wiki.tcl.tk/menu*
perhaps it could be copied for ConTeXt wiki...don´
Hi Matt,
>> b) It is hard to classify the documents. Two possibilities:
>
> Yes, it is hard to classify them (and many other things) if you insist
> on forcing them into a single, canonical hierarchy.
Oh, I don't insist on anything; I just don't have clue how to start...
> But what if you class
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 05:55:24PM +0200, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
> > Arguments for a collection could be:
> >
> > 1) Perhaps a comprehensive and classified collection of sample documents
> >could spare others such time consuming trials.
>
> a) it is impossible to have a comprehensive collect
Hello Holger,
>> >> [starting ConTeXt wiki at] http://members.ping.de:8062/
>> What kind of example documents do you think of? I guess that you know
>> that the magazines on the main ConTeXt site have their source code
>> included?
> I was thinking of all kinds of day-to-day documents, like the
Hello,
> >> [starting ConTeXt wiki at] http://members.ping.de:8062/
>
> > Finde ich eine gute Idee! Was mir (neben der Hilfe auf auf der Liste für
> > neue Probleme) am meisten bringt, und ich bisher etwas vermisse, sind
> > Beispiel-Dokumente (genauer: deren Quellcode).
> [missing example docu
Hello Holger and everybody,
>> [starting ConTeXt wiki at] http://members.ping.de:8062/
> Finde ich eine gute Idee! Was mir (neben der Hilfe auf auf der Liste für
> neue Probleme) am meisten bringt, und ich bisher etwas vermisse, sind
> Beispiel-Dokumente (genauer: deren Quellcode).
[missing ex
20 matches
Mail list logo
