[NTG-context] Re: Equivalent for hdots and hdotsfor

2023-12-30 Thread Mikael Sundqvist
Hi, On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 9:45 AM Shiv Shankar Dayal wrote: > > In LaTeX, I can use \hdots for horizontal dots and \hdotsfor{n} to fill for > several columns in a determinant. But these do not work in ConTeXt. What is > the equivalent for these in ConTeXt? You can try \HF or \HF[n].

[NTG-context] Re: Equivalent for hdots and hdotsfor

2023-12-30 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Shiv Shankar Dayal schrieb am 30.12.2023 um 09:41: In LaTeX, I can use \hdots for horizontal dots and \hdotsfor{n} to fill for several columns in a determinant. But these do not work in ConTeXt. What is the equivalent for these in ConTeXt? Can you show the desired output from LaTeX with a PDF

[NTG-context] Re: Equivalent for hdots and hdotsfor

2023-12-30 Thread Shiv Shankar Dayal
Never mind, I found the solution on list that we can use \dotfill and \multispan{n}{\dotfill} as a substitute for what I have asked for. On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 2:11 PM Shiv Shankar Dayal < shivshankar.da...@gmail.com> wrote: > In LaTeX, I can use \hdots for horizontal dots and \hdotsfor{n} to