It seems that displaystyle fractions insert extra vertical space before the
main item.
With textstyle fractions, the code works fine.
\blank[back,overlay] can get rid of the gap above the first row, but not
the space inserted by \dfrac.
\defineitemgroup[alex]
\setupitemgroup
[alex]
[each]
[a,
Hi Mikael,
That looks very attractive. However, with the following code, I end up with a
large gap above the first row.
\defineitemgroup[alex]
\setupitemgroup
[alex]
[each]
[a,two]
[
margin=2cm,
before=\blank[overlay,-depth],
stopper=)
]
\showboxes
\autofences
\starttext
\samplefile{w
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 7:16 AM Alexandre Christe
wrote:
>
> It’s true that \vtop{…} does the job for a single line of items, but it
> doesn’t in the case there’re multiple (\vtop{}) aligns with the bottom.
>
> Here’s a modified MWE
>
> \startitemize[n][style=\bf]
> \item \godown[-\linehei
It’s true that \vtop{…} does the job for a single line of items, but it doesn’t
in the case there’re multiple (\vtop{}) aligns with the bottom.
Here’s a modified MWE
\startitemize[n][style=\bf]
\item \godown[-\lineheight] \startitemize
[a,columns,two,packed,broad][stopper=),before={\blank[now
I'd do it this way:
\starttext
\startitemize[n][style=\bf]
\item\vtop{%
\startitemize[a,horizontal,four][stopper=\)]
\startitem
$6(x - \dfrac{5}{12})^2 - \dfrac{1}{24}$
\stopitem
\startitem
$-3(x - \dfrac{1}{3})^2 + \dfrac{1}{3}$
\stopitem
\startitem
$7(x +
Dear ConTeXt users,
Time goes by but I haven't yet found a nice solution to this issue. When
having mathematics, I'd not like to adjust by hand the factor of \linewidth
for the \godown command.
Here's a MWE
\starttext
\startitemize[n][style=\bf]
\item \godown[-\lineheight] \startitemize
[a,co