[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-05-19 Thread garulfo
> So is the plan to go through each of the main headings in the left side-bar > and make the same type of change? Yes. Maybe new ones will have to be added ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, pleas

[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-05-18 Thread Bruce Horrocks
On 17 May 2024, at 21:40, garu...@azules.eu wrote: > > I have tested on 2 pages : > - https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Sciences (only mathematics part) > - https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Fonts > > After these tests, I think this may help users to find their way around the > various sources of docu

[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-05-17 Thread garulfo
I have tested on 2 pages : - https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Sciences (only mathematics part) - https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Fonts After these tests, I think this may help users to find their way around the various sources of documentation : In one small table he/she has an overview of the docum

[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-04-18 Thread Bruce Horrocks
> On 17 Apr 2024, at 13:17, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > > Am 17.04.24 um 13:57 schrieb Bruce Horrocks: >> - There are at least two books, and a third being written but not yet >> released: these fit into the Tutorials and Explanation quadrants. > > Which published books do you mean? Not pub

[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-04-17 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 17.04.24 um 23:25 schrieb Garulfo: - exactly, it's not a question of proposing new documents, but of proposing another complementary way of accessing and browsing existing ones. - Actually, the wiki is (or can be) a hub for the 4 needs:   - "Reference" like https://wiki.contextgarden.net/C

[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-04-17 Thread Garulfo
Le 17/04/2024 à 13:57, Bruce Horrocks a écrit : On 14 Apr 2024, at 12:21, garu...@azules.eu wrote: Hi all, I just discover the Diátaxis documentation framework : I'd be more confident if you had started by saying "I've been using the Diátaxis for the last ten years and have used it on m

[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-04-17 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 17.04.24 um 13:57 schrieb Bruce Horrocks: - There are at least two books, and a third being written but not yet released: these fit into the Tutorials and Explanation quadrants. Which published books do you mean? I know of Alan Braslau’s book, AFAIK that will be published in French “soon”

[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-04-17 Thread Bruce Horrocks
> On 14 Apr 2024, at 12:21, garu...@azules.eu wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just discover the Diátaxis documentation framework : I'd be more confident if you had started by saying "I've been using the Diátaxis for the last ten years and have used it on multiple projects". ;-) > - https://www.diat

[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-04-17 Thread jbf
Unfortunately, despite all that has been said, we have to realise what words actually mean in English, and 'infamous' has a negative connotation. So I recommend rephrasing this and perhaps the entire paragraph so that it presents a positive perspective on ConTeXt. But if you mean 'less known' t

[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-04-17 Thread Joaquín Ataz López
I used “infamous” as a funny way to say “not famous, but somewhat known” (and yes, I know Latin and what the words really mean). That was my understanding. Infamous=Not famous; that is, not as well known as others. A slight play on words. -- Joaquín Ataz López Departamento de Derecho civil

[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-04-17 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 17.04.24 um 10:36 schrieb Hans Hagen: On 4/17/2024 8:32 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On 16. Apr 2024, at 21:56, Peter Hopcroft via ntg-context wrote: On 17/04/2024, at 7:11 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: In my poster (still WIP) I wrote: … Excellent No, I must admit I don’t lik

[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-04-17 Thread Hans Hagen
On 4/17/2024 8:32 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On 16. Apr 2024, at 21:56, Peter Hopcroft via ntg-context wrote: On 17/04/2024, at 7:11 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: In my poster (still WIP) I wrote: … Excellent No, I must admit I don’t like the first two paragraphs. The question i

[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-04-16 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
> On 16. Apr 2024, at 21:56, Peter Hopcroft via ntg-context > wrote: > > > >> On 17/04/2024, at 7:11 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: >> >> In my poster (still WIP) I wrote: >> … > > Excellent No, I must admit I don’t like the first two paragraphs. The question is “what is ConTeXt,” and t

[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-04-16 Thread Peter Hopcroft via ntg-context
> On 17/04/2024, at 7:11 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > > In my poster (still WIP) I wrote: > … Excellent ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-

[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-04-16 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 14.04.24 um 21:45 schrieb Peter Hopcroft via ntg-context: It would be great if the main page actually said what Context does. In my poster (still WIP) I wrote: start --- The “infamous” alternative to LaTeX While most designers use graphical tools, there are still areas where code-based t

[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-04-14 Thread Peter Hopcroft via ntg-context
It would be great if the main page actually said what Context does. > On 15/04/2024, at 2:18 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > > Hi Garulfo, > > I’m not against the “new order”, but I’d keep the colorful subject tiles. > Different accesses are good IMO (as long as it doesn’t get to convoluted

[NTG-context] Re: Wiki - test/proposal to further clarify documentation

2024-04-14 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Hi Garulfo, I’m not against the “new order”, but I’d keep the colorful subject tiles. Different accesses are good IMO (as long as it doesn’t get to convoluted). I’d say updating, sorting, restructuring pages is more important than a new start page. Yes, please sort out reference vs. tutori