[NTG-context] Re: documenting itemize specials

2024-07-07 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 07.07.24 um 18:03 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: Henning Hraban Ramm schrieb am 07.07.2024 um 10:54: Hi, * can anyone give me an example where \noitem makes sense? This is why the command exists: \starttext \startitemize[repeat,n][width=0pt] \noitem   \startitemize[a,broad]   \item First it

[NTG-context] Re: documenting itemize specials

2024-07-07 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Henning Hraban Ramm schrieb am 07.07.2024 um 10:54: Hi, * can anyone give me an example where \noitem makes sense? This is why the command exists: \starttext \startitemize[repeat,n][width=0pt] \noitem \startitemize[a,broad] \item First item \item Second item \stopitemize \noitem \st

[NTG-context] Re: documenting itemize specials

2024-07-07 Thread fv leung
Numerical answers to a 3-part math problem in which the 2nd part is a proof: \startitemize[a] \item 1234 \noitem \item 5679 \stopitemize > On 7 Jul 2024, at 4:54 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > > Hi, > * can anyone give me an example where \noitem makes sense? > * is the + symbol of \sub conf