This one is supposed to work with the latest version.
At 17:36 11/10/2003, you wrote:
From: "Pawel Jackowski na Onet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 9:29 AM
> At 11:09 11/10/2003, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> > > are quite different... There are some warnings in newer one (about
Problem: a (very) different ConTeXt versions and a different output
From: "Hans Hagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:52 PM
> At 17:36 11/10/2003, you wrote:
>
> >Lets consider the following code:
> >
> >\setupitemize[4,packed]
> >\starttext
> >\sta
At 17:36 11/10/2003, you wrote:
Lets consider the following code:
\setupitemize[4,packed]
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\item one
\item two
\item three
\stopitemize
\stoptext
The problem is that in newer installation, default itemize style (meaning
packed, with triangle symbol) IS FORCED instead
At 08:26 12/10/2003, you wrote:
2003.10.5 versions gives the same output. Could you give me a recipe to spy
changes? I'm sure they are documented, but don't know how to get them.
most changes concern (yet) undocumented features, bug fixes, extensions
discussed on this list (user requests) ; drast
At 11:59 12/10/2003, you wrote:
Hi,
> I should describe it more precisely. I use installations (2 at the moment)
> based on TL distributions.
With the supplied ConTeXt versions?
> Anyway, I'm aware, that
> ConTeXt is developing quite fast and I probably shouldn't expect,
> that 2002.524 and 2003.
Hi,
> I should describe it more precisely. I use installations (2 at the moment)
> based on TL distributions.
With the supplied ConTeXt versions?
> Anyway, I'm aware, that
> ConTeXt is developing quite fast and I probably shouldn't expect,
> that 2002.524 and 2003.10.5 versions gives the same o
From: "Patrick Gundlach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 6:48 PM
> Hi,
>
> >> >tl7: ConTeXt ver: 2002.5.24 fmt: 2003.10.6 int: english mes:
english
> >> >tl8: ConTeXt ver: 2003.10.5 fmt: 2003.10.10 int: english mes:
english
> >
> > Ok, the difference is about 17 month
Hi,
>> >tl7: ConTeXt ver: 2002.5.24 fmt: 2003.10.6 int: english mes: english
>> >tl8: ConTeXt ver: 2003.10.5 fmt: 2003.10.10 int: english mes: english
>
> Ok, the difference is about 17 months in ConTeXt version, while formats are
> quite fresh... Can't see the clue :-?
Sorry for not bein
From: "Pawel Jackowski na Onet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 9:29 AM
> At 11:09 11/10/2003, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> > > are quite different... There are some warnings in newer one (about
doubled
> > > map entries) but shouldn't play a role here. Thanks for any hints!
> >
At 11:09 11/10/2003, you wrote:
Hi,
> are quite different... There are some warnings in newer one (about doubled
> map entries) but shouldn't play a role here. Thanks for any hints!
right. You might want to clean up the map files, but that is not
important.
tl7: ConTeXt ver: 2002.5.24 fmt: 2003.
Hi,
> are quite different... There are some warnings in newer one (about doubled
> map entries) but shouldn't play a role here. Thanks for any hints!
right. You might want to clean up the map files, but that is not
important.
tl7: ConTeXt ver: 2002.5.24 fmt: 2003.10.6 int: english mes: engl
11 matches
Mail list logo
