On 12/3/2015 3:16 AM, Maggyero wrote:
In both LaTeX and ConTeXt, we have two kinds of fonts:
— a text font: multi-letter words;
— a math font: single letter words.
In math mode, using LaTeX, text fonts can use both
— text spacing: $\textit{abc ffi}$ gives abc ffi;
— math spacing: $\mathit{abc f
Hans Hagen wrote:
> you need to be more explicit about the problems you encounter (minimal
examples for instance)
To be more precise (please see the enclosed P.D.F. file), I would like the
same font possibilities in ConTeXt math mode as shown in the following
table from Will Robertson's talk at 41
Hans Hagen wrote:
> you need to be more explicit about the problems you encounter (minimal
examples for instance)
To be more precise (please see the enclosed P.D.F. file), I would like the
same font possibilities in ConTeXt math mode as shown in the following
table from Will Robertson's talk at 41
On 11/30/2015 6:20 PM, Maggyero wrote:
Is there a plan to have in ConTeXt the same kind of math behavior that
Will Robertson implemented in the last version of his unicode-math LaTeX
package (\mathrm, \mathit, \mathbf, \symrm, \symit, \symbf, etc.)?
Because ConTeXt currently has the same math/tex
Is there a plan to have in ConTeXt the same kind of math behavior that Will
Robertson implemented in the last version of his unicode-math LaTeX package
(\mathrm, \mathit, \mathbf, \symrm, \symit, \symbf, etc.)? Because ConTeXt
currently has the same math/text spacing issues in math mode that the ol