--- On Jan 13, Aditya Mahajan wrote ---
--- On Jan 13, Hans Hagen wrote ---
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
No, I mean the complicated math is much harder in context. Consider
\begin{align}
a = b \\
c = d \notag \\
= f \notag \\
= g
\end{align}
which will typeset as
a = b(1)
c =
Hello,
%D \startbuffer
%D \placeformula \startformula \startalign
%D \NC a \NC \eq b \NR[+]
%D \NC c \NC \neq d \NR
%D \NC\NC \neq f \NR[for:hans]
%D \NC\NC \geq g \NR[for:whoelse][a]
%D \NC\NC \leq h \NR[for:whomore][b]
%D \NC\NC \neq i \NR
%D \stopalign \stopformula
%D
Just to give you some hints what's already there...
Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
63 lines deleted by Adam Duck
1. Have align support with variable number of columns.
a = b
= c + d
+ e
should be typeset as
a = b
= c + d
+ e
At least this should be
--- On Jan 14, Adam Duck wrote ---
Just to give you some hints what's already there...
Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
63 lines deleted by Adam Duck
1. Have align support with variable number of columns.
a = b
= c + d
+ e
should be typeset as
a = b
= c + d
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
No, I mean the complicated math is much harder in context. Consider
\begin{align}
a = b \\
c = d \notag \\
= f \notag \\
= g
\end{align}
which will typeset as
a = b(1)
c = d
= f
= g(2)
\begin{subequations}
\begin{align}
a = b \\
c = d
--- On Jan 13, Hans Hagen wrote ---
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
No, I mean the complicated math is much harder in context. Consider
\begin{align}
a = b \\
c = d \notag \\
= f \notag \\
= g
\end{align}
which will typeset as
a = b(1)
c = d
= f
= g(2)
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Most math in latex is *not* same as tex math. Though, most that can be
done with latex can also be done in tex, but latex does provide a nice
interface which sadly is missing in context. amsl and nath modules
provide some of this functionality but a lot still needs to be
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Most math in latex is *not* same as tex math. Though, most that can be done
with latex can also be done in tex, but latex does provide a nice interface
which sadly is missing in context. amsl and nath modules provide some of
this
I have been using ConTeXt for a short time now, after I switched from
LaTeX. I find it quite great, but I have two queries regarding it. I
am using teTeX in Debian (unstable).
1. Are the Lucida Bright fonts used in the documentation part of the
complete teTeX documentation or are they fonts
