Re: [NTG-context] Rendering of ZWNJ and ZWJ

2008-06-12 Thread Hans Hagen
Khaled Hosny wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 06:32:13PM -0600, Idris Samawi Hamid wrote: >> Hi Hans, >> >> On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:45:10 -0600, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Khaled Hosny wrote: Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the font ha

Re: [NTG-context] Rendering of ZWNJ and ZWJ

2008-06-12 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 06:32:13PM -0600, Idris Samawi Hamid wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:45:10 -0600, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Khaled Hosny wrote: > >> Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the > >> font has a glyph for it, it doe

Re: [NTG-context] Rendering of ZWNJ and ZWJ

2008-06-10 Thread Hans Hagen
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:45:31 -0600, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Idris Samawi Hamid wrote: >>> Can this be made an option, so fonts that contain zwj zwnj are not >>> affected? >> ok, the next version will have >> >> otf.remove_joiners = true -- default >

Re: [NTG-context] Rendering of ZWNJ and ZWJ

2008-06-10 Thread Idris Samawi Hamid
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:45:31 -0600, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Idris Samawi Hamid wrote: >> Can this be made an option, so fonts that contain zwj zwnj are not >> affected? > > ok, the next version will have > > otf.remove_joiners = true -- default Our main test fonts + professional f

Re: [NTG-context] Rendering of ZWNJ and ZWJ

2008-06-10 Thread Hans Hagen
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote: > Can this be made an option, so fonts that contain zwj zwnj are not > affected? ok, the next version will have otf.remove_joiners = true -- default later we can make it an option in the font definition -

Re: [NTG-context] Rendering of ZWNJ and ZWJ

2008-06-09 Thread Idris Samawi Hamid
Hi Hans, On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:45:10 -0600, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Khaled Hosny wrote: >> Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the >> font has a glyph for it, it does the expected behaviour (force >> non-joining or joining respectively) but the gl

Re: [NTG-context] Rendering of ZWNJ and ZWJ

2008-06-09 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 05:45:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: > Khaled Hosny wrote: > > Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the > > font has a glyph for it, it does the expected behaviour (force > > non-joining or joining respectively) but the glyph get rendered while

Re: [NTG-context] Rendering of ZWNJ and ZWJ

2008-06-09 Thread Hans Hagen
Khaled Hosny wrote: > Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the > font has a glyph for it, it does the expected behaviour (force > non-joining or joining respectively) but the glyph get rendered while it > shouldn't. But if the font has no glyphs for it, it has no eff

Re: [NTG-context] Rendering of ZWNJ and ZWJ

2008-06-09 Thread Hans Hagen
Khaled Hosny wrote: > Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the > font has a glyph for it, it does the expected behaviour (force > non-joining or joining respectively) but the glyph get rendered while it > shouldn't. But if the font has no glyphs for it, it has no eff

[NTG-context] Rendering of ZWNJ and ZWJ

2008-06-08 Thread Khaled Hosny
Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the font has a glyph for it, it does the expected behaviour (force non-joining or joining respectively) but the glyph get rendered while it shouldn't. But if the font has no glyphs for it, it has no effect at all. See the attache