I think this is a problem concerning the improper variables in the font:(
The em space should not get from the chinese fonts, but directly from
the font size the user invoked (for example, for 30pt font 1em=30pt ).
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Yanrui Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/24
2008/10/24 Yue Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Oh, btw, Yanrui Li also has a problem concerning the space between
> chinese and english (different space skips when use different chinese
> fonts). He is also in the list so I think it is better to leave to him
> to describe the problem.
I have ever rep
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Yue Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Hans:
>
>>
>> more detail needed, what problem, what test file
>>
>
> OK, I forwarded the source code from Longming Wang to you in a private
> mail. It was once solved, but later appeared again (maybe during the
> 10/1 updat
Hi, Hans:
>
> more detail needed, what problem, what test file
>
OK, I forwarded the source code from Longming Wang to you in a private
mail. It was once solved, but later appeared again (maybe during the
10/1 update).
Yue Wang
Yue Wang wrote:
> Hi, Hans
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Yanrui Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:17:15PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>> Longmin Wang wrote:
>>>
Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
I test a more compli
Hi, Hans
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Yanrui Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:17:15PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>Longmin Wang wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
>>> I test a more complicated file which is attached
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:17:15PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
>Longmin Wang wrote:
>
>> Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
>> I test a more complicated file which is attached below. In this file,
>> both \bf and \bi give the same font lmroman10-bold.
>
>experim
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:17:15PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
>Longmin Wang wrote:
>
>> Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
>> I test a more complicated file which is attached below. In this file,
>> both \bf and \bi give the same font lmroman10-bold.
>
>experim
Longmin Wang wrote:
> Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
> I test a more complicated file which is attached below. In this file,
> both \bf and \bi give the same font lmroman10-bold.
experimental patch in beta
--
Longmin Wang wrote:
> Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
> I test a more complicated file which is attached below. In this file,
> both \bf and \bi give the same font lmroman10-bold.
>
> I guess the reason is that I use the same Chinese font
> AdobeHeitiStd
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 11:55:21AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
>there was a bug as well as the fact that your definition is wrong
>
>% engine=luatex
>
>\ctxlua{fonts.collections.trace = true}
>
>\definefontfeature[zh][mode=node,script=hang,lang=zhs]
>
>\starttypescript [serif] [zhfont]
> \definefo
Yue Wang wrote:
> Hi, Hans:
>
> Today I am trying to compile my new book chapter on aerosol science
> using MKIV. It works great! Thank you.
> Most commands are successful (rm, ss, mono) after I define a
> typescript for the Chinese font.
> commands like \bfa also works.
> However, basic TeX comm
12 matches
Mail list logo
