Re[2]: [NTG-context] Updated Nath/AmSL modules

2003-12-03 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Monday, December 1, 2003 Tobias Burnus wrote: Hi, On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 04:24:16PM +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: And for the I'm stupid series, I reintroduced an old bug in fixing another, so here we are again. Hmm, I saved that file (nath.tar.bz2), used bunzip2 (nath.tar). But this

Re: [NTG-context] Updated Nath/AmSL modules

2003-12-01 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Saturday, November 29, 2003 Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: Hello guys, for those among you who need to do math stuff, I updated the nath and amsl modules, fixing a couple of bugs (no new features yet). And for the I'm stupid series, I reintroduced an old bug in fixing another, so here we are

Re: [NTG-context] Updated Nath/AmSL modules

2003-12-01 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi, On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 04:24:16PM +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: And for the I'm stupid series, I reintroduced an old bug in fixing another, so here we are again. Hmm, I saved that file (nath.tar.bz2), used bunzip2 (nath.tar). But this file is not a tar archive as one might expect but only

Re[2]: [NTG-context] Updated Nath/AmSL modules

2003-12-01 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Monday, December 1, 2003 Tobias Burnus wrote: Hi, On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 04:24:16PM +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: And for the I'm stupid series, I reintroduced an old bug in fixing another, so here we are again. Hmm, I saved that file (nath.tar.bz2), used bunzip2 (nath.tar). But this

[NTG-context] Updated Nath/AmSL modules

2003-11-29 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Hello guys, for those among you who need to do math stuff, I updated the nath and amsl modules, fixing a couple of bugs (no new features yet). Let me know how they fare. NATH.TAR.BZ2 Description: Binary data