Mentioned on their wiki at: https://wiki.lyx.org/FAQ/ImportExport
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:55 AM, William Adams
wrote:
> Is it not an option to use LyX, and then pandoc to convert to ConTeXt?
>
> http://pandoc.org/
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Roger Mason
Is it not an option to use LyX, and then pandoc to convert to ConTeXt?
http://pandoc.org/
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Roger Mason wrote:
> Hello Jonas,
>
> Jonas Baggett writes:
>
> > Thank you for the suggestion. I was first thinking about incrementally
Hello Jonas,
Jonas Baggett writes:
> Thank you for the suggestion. I was first thinking about incrementally
> creating a custom format that evolves as features are implemented. And
> for translating the custom format into a backend format, I was
> thinking of creating files
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017, Floris van Manen wrote:
it might be simpler to have a ‘watch’ option for the context compiler
combined with an ‘open result’. e.g. the coffeescript compiler allows
for a ‘-w’ option, it will keep the compiler running in the background
and start compiling the file(s) as
it might be simpler to have a ‘watch’ option for the context compiler combined
with an ‘open result’.
e.g. the coffeescript compiler allows for a ‘-w’ option, it will keep the
compiler running in the background and
start compiling the file(s) as soon as it detects any changes.
i guess such
While not an editor, but rather a language, Skribilo
(http://www.nongnu.org/skribilo/) can output documents in various
formats, including Context and Lout. I have worked a bit on getting
better Context output from it and last tinkered with the math output
about a year ago. Such a system might
On 2017-12-06, at 22:03, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
> On 2017-12-06 Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>> On 2017-12-06, at 00:01, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
>>> On 2017-12-02 Jonas Baggett wrote:
This is a blog post I recently published:
On 2017-12-06 Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> On 2017-12-06, at 00:01, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
>> On 2017-12-02 Jonas Baggett wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a blog post I recently published:
>>> https://jonas17b.wixsite.com/monsite/home/wysiwym-editor-on-top-of-context-lout
>>> It is about
On 2017-12-06, at 00:01, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
> On 2017-12-02 Jonas Baggett wrote:
>>
>> This is a blog post I recently published:
>> https://jonas17b.wixsite.com/monsite/home/wysiwym-editor-on-top-of-
>> context-lout.
>> It is about some ideas I have for a WYSIWYM editor
On 2017-12-02 Jonas Baggett wrote:
>
> This is a blog post I recently published:
> https://jonas17b.wixsite.com/monsite/home/wysiwym-editor-on-top-of-
> context-lout.
> It is about some ideas I have for a WYSIWYM editor like LyX, but it
> would be designed for using more than 1 backend (e.g.
Le 03.12.17 à 18:00, Aditya Mahajan a écrit :
This is a blog post I recently published:
https://jonas17b.wixsite.com/monsite/home/wysiwym-editor-on-top-of-context-lout.
It is about some ideas I have for a WYSIWYM editor like LyX, but it
would be designed for using more than 1 backend (e.g.
This is a blog post I recently published:
https://jonas17b.wixsite.com/monsite/home/wysiwym-editor-on-top-of-context-lout.
It is about some ideas I have for a WYSIWYM editor like LyX, but it
would be designed for using more than 1 backend (e.g. ConTeXt, Lout),
and to give a much better user
Hello,
Jonas Baggett writes:
> This is a blog post I recently published:
> https://jonas17b.wixsite.com/monsite/home/wysiwym-editor-on-top-of-context-lout.
> It
> is about some ideas I have for a WYSIWYM editor like LyX, but it would
> be designed for using more than 1
>/A desktop editor, not so much. But it'd be wonderful to have a cloud />/based
one with Git integration. /
+1 for desktop editor, although I plan to use Emacs for my ConTeXt writing, so
having better support in AUCTeX would be also nice. At the end, I believe that
Emacs is not so scary as it
> Hi Jonas,
> A desktop editor, not so much. But it'd be wonderful to have a cloud
based
> one with Git integration. I've rolled my own with floobits and my own VM,
> but that doesn't scale and I can't share it with my students.
>
> What you describe has already been worked on by overleaf in
Hi Hraban,
The type of users that I would like to target, will be those writting
documents of more than 10 - 12 pages. Typically students or professional
that are used to write reports with Word but would be interested to use
a more productive editor, but not ready to move too far away from
Am 2017-12-02 um 08:42 schrieb Jonas Baggett :
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is a blog post I recently published:
> https://jonas17b.wixsite.com/monsite/home/wysiwym-editor-on-top-of-context-lout.
> It is about some ideas I have for a WYSIWYM editor like LyX, but it would be
>
On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 19:40:35 +1100
Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote:
> A desktop editor, not so much. But it'd be wonderful to have a cloud
> based one with Git integration.
+1 for desktop editor, although I plan to use Emacs for my ConTeXt writing, so
having better support in
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 08:42:59AM +0100, Jonas Baggett wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is a blog post I recently published:
> https://jonas17b.wixsite.com/monsite/home/wysiwym-editor-on-top-of-context-lout.
See screenshot showing your website in my browser.
--
Siep Kroonenberg
Hi Jonas,
A desktop editor, not so much. But it'd be wonderful to have a cloud based
one with Git integration. I've rolled my own with floobits and my own VM,
but that doesn't scale and I can't share it with my students.
What you describe has already been worked on by overleaf in terms of a
Hi everyone,
This is a blog post I recently published:
https://jonas17b.wixsite.com/monsite/home/wysiwym-editor-on-top-of-context-lout.
It is about some ideas I have for a WYSIWYM editor like LyX, but it
would be designed for using more than 1 backend (e.g. ConTeXt, Lout),
and to give a much
21 matches
Mail list logo