On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:18:14 +0200, Sietse Brouwer wrote:
or
?
Both work. Because both work, we have no way to force future edits to
be XHTML compliant, so I don't think it is productive to try to
enforce XHTML compliance in this. Instead, if we ever do need
compliant XHTML, we can have a b
Procházka Lukáš wrote:
> BTW: Which of the following specifications is correct [for wiki]:
>
>
> or
> ?
Both work. Because both work, we have no way to force future edits to
be XHTML compliant, so I don't think it is productive to try to
enforce XHTML compliance in this. Instead, if we ever do ne
On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 10:01:25 +0200, Sietse Brouwer wrote:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Help:Context
BTW: Which of the following specifications is correct [for wiki]:
or
?
The former is used in the "prelast" example on
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Help:Context and - AFAIK (see e.g.
http
Hi Lukáš,
(CC Mojca, Taco)
> [\setupdelimitedtext example]
> is successfully compiled by the current Ctx version whilst the same example
> on http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/setupdelimitedtext is not.
Yes, the wiki's ConTeXt installation is about a year old, as you can see at
http://wiki.co
Hello,
maybe the known problem with the wiki and the "current" Ctx versions.
The following code:
\setuppapersize[A5]
\starttext
\definedelimitedtext[mydt]
\setupdelimitedtext[mydt][left=\leftguillemot,right=\rightguillemot]
\quotation{Clancy of the Overflow}, by Banjo Paterson
\startmyd
