On 2013–09–30 Hans Hagen wrote:
these are unrelated mechanisms where the first one just does some
pdf magic ... no feedback to tex about widths (ok, i could write
something better but never had and still don't have a reason for
that kind of low level pdf based approach to be really deeply
On 10/1/2013 10:05 AM, Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–09–30 Hans Hagen wrote:
these are unrelated mechanisms where the first one just does some
pdf magic ... no feedback to tex about widths (ok, i could write
something better but never had and still don't have a reason for
that kind of low level
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 11:20:52AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 10/1/2013 10:05 AM, Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–09–30 Hans Hagen wrote:
these are unrelated mechanisms where the first one just does some
pdf magic ... no feedback to tex about widths (ok, i could write
something better but
···date: 2013-10-01, Tuesday···from: Khaled Hosny···
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 11:20:52AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 10/1/2013 10:05 AM, Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–09–30 Hans Hagen wrote:
these are unrelated mechanisms where the first one just does some
pdf magic ... no feedback to
On 10/1/2013 12:17 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–10–01 Philipp Gesang wrote:
When using the characterkerning method you can exempt ligatures
and character pairs from being letterspaced by defining the
functions typesetters.kerns.keepligature (liganode) and
typesetters.kerns.keeptogether
Hi,
the stretch effect does not take the final width of the string into
account. Is this a bug or a limitation? Example:
\starttext
(\effect[stretch]{fftabc})\par %% “c” collides with “)”
(\kerncharacters[.05]fftabc)%% no collision
\stoptext
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital