fyi: some of my answers of last weeks bounced (not all) but i'm not
going to resent them as others answered as well
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt
Thank you, friends, for answers.
To Hahns:
Can I make $$ envinroment behave like \startformula? In other words, to
redefine $$ to be substituted by \start-stop formula? Writing
\startformula and \stopformula every time is too verbose.
To Mojca:
OK, the current solution works for me. Don't
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:08, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Thank you, friends, for answers.
To Mojca:
OK, the current solution works for me. Don't want to complicate it further,
just want to point out that Knuth compatibility is broken :)
I don't think so. You probably didn't get any output
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Thank you, friends, for answers.
To Hahns:
Can I make $$ envinroment behave like \startformula? In other words, to
no
redefine $$ to be substituted by \start-stop formula? Writing
\startformula and \stopformula every time is too verbose.
well, time spent on
