On 2/14/20 3:43 AM, Rik Kabel wrote:
> [...]
> The further I look into bookmark, annotation, and attachment handling by
> a number of viewers, the more confusing things appear.
Hi Rik,
this is why following the prescription (the PDF spec) is better in order
to check the standard than gathering in
On 2/13/2020 03:56, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2/13/2020 12:45 AM, Rik Kabel wrote:
Perhaps there is something in the difference between annotations and
attachments that results in different treatments by the various viewers.
it has always been that messy; there's also the annotation symbol
treatme
On 2/13/2020 12:45 AM, Rik Kabel wrote:
Perhaps there is something in the difference between annotations and
attachments that results in different treatments by the various viewers.
it has always been that messy; there's also the annotation symbol
treatment that can differ; it doesn't help that
Following up on my viewer observations, I downloaded Evince for Windows
version 2.32 and see something that might be meaningful.
Evince has a side-panel with a drop-down for selecting Thumbnails,
Index, Attachments, Layers, or Annotations. Those that are not present
in the document are greyed
On 2/12/2020 14:20, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 2/8/20 10:13 PM, Rik Kabel wrote:
Not quite ready yet. When the hidden method is used, it passes the
online validator[1], but fails VeraPDF[2] for clause 6.8-1. When
visible, it fails the online validator stating that the appearance
dictionary doesn
On 2/8/20 10:13 PM, Rik Kabel wrote:
>
>
> Not quite ready yet. When the hidden method is used, it passes the
> online validator[1], but fails VeraPDF[2] for clause 6.8-1. When
> visible, it fails the online validator stating that the appearance
> dictionary doesn't contain an entry, and fails Vera
On 2/8/2020 12:32, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 2/8/20 1:45 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
[...]
I attached the current code, so you and Rik are able to test it if you
want (creating a new format is required). Best contact me off-list if
you run into new problems.
Hi Peter,
the new version is fine for m
On 2/8/20 1:45 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
> [...]
>
> I attached the current code, so you and Rik are able to test it if you
> want (creating a new format is required). Best contact me off-list if
> you run into new problems.
Hi Peter,
the new version is fine for me.
From what I see, /F is now set to
Am 07.02.2020 um 22:37 schrieb Hans Hagen:
> On 2/7/2020 9:55 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> On 2/7/20 9:19 PM, Rik Kabel wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/7/2020 14:46, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
many thanks for having fixed the issues with attachments (in latest
beta
from 2020.02.07 18:36). I haven’t
On 2/7/20 10:37 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Peter is stepwise looking into all these issues but we decided to also
> see how that checking and standards evolve in cases where it's a
> confusing mess. And these 'appearance dicts' are an example of a mess.
> On the one hand there's predefined appearances
On 2/7/2020 9:55 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 2/7/20 9:19 PM, Rik Kabel wrote:
On 2/7/2020 14:46, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
many thanks for having fixed the issues with attachments (in latest beta
from 2020.02.07 18:36). I haven’t tested attachments with PDF/A-3a.
PDF/A-3a attachments still fa
On 2/7/20 9:19 PM, Rik Kabel wrote:
>
> On 2/7/2020 14:46, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> many thanks for having fixed the issues with attachments (in latest beta
>> from 2020.02.07 18:36). I haven’t tested attachments with PDF/A-3a.
>>
> PDF/A-3a attachments still fail validation with the same issues.
On 2/7/2020 14:46, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
many thanks for having fixed the issues with attachments (in latest beta
from 2020.02.07 18:36). I haven’t tested attachments with PDF/A-3a.
PDF/A-3a attachments still fail validation with the same issues.
--
Rik
_
Hans,
many thanks for having fixed the issues with attachments (in latest beta
from 2020.02.07 18:36). I haven’t tested attachments with PDF/A-3a.
But there is still an issue with /EmbeddedFiles. MWE:
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext
\startTEXpage[offset=1em]
a\attachmen
14 matches
Mail list logo
