Re: [NTG-context] beta (processaction |)

Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Rolf wrote: Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Rolf wrote: \processaction[\FOO][ |=, unknown=] hm, | and ~ are always special, put \string in fron tof it, or use \letterbar and \lettertilde hm, same error if I use \string| or \letterbar

Re: [NTG-context] beta (processaction |)

Peter Rolf wrote: Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Rolf wrote: Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Rolf wrote: \processaction[\FOO][ |=, unknown=] hm, | and ~ are always special, put \string in fron tof it, or use \letterbar and \lettertilde

[NTG-context] beta (processaction |)

Hi, the vertical line symbol | (pipe) breaks \processaction (no problem with the latest stable version). The minimal example at the end of this message results in: [..] systems : begin file processaction at line 3 ! Undefined control sequence. \dotextmodediscretionary ...up \let

Re: [NTG-context] beta (processaction |)

Peter Rolf wrote: \processaction[\FOO][ |=, unknown=] hm, | and ~ are always special, put \string in fron tof it, or use \letterbar and \lettertilde Hans - Hans Hagen |

Re: [NTG-context] beta (processaction |)

Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Rolf wrote: \processaction[\FOO][ |=, unknown=] hm, | and ~ are always special, put \string in fron tof it, or use \letterbar and \lettertilde hm, same error if I use \string| or \letterbar Peter Hans

Re: [NTG-context] beta (processaction |)

Peter Rolf wrote: Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Rolf wrote: \processaction[\FOO][ |=, unknown=] hm, | and ~ are always special, put \string in fron tof it, or use \letterbar and \lettertilde hm, same error if I use \string| or \letterbar do you have a

Re: [NTG-context] beta (processaction |)

Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Rolf wrote: Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Rolf wrote: \processaction[\FOO][ |=, unknown=] hm, | and ~ are always special, put \string in fron tof it, or use \letterbar and \lettertilde hm, same error if I use \string| or \letterbar