On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 07:26:43PM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Now, I think I discovered another bug (or feature?), the function will
ignore any zeros at the left which isn't what one expects.
This happen to be some thing in Lua itself:
s = 000123 print(s)
will give 123, so it have to be a
Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:46:47AM +0300, Khaled Hosny wrote:
It seems that there is a bug in converters.alphabetic function,
converters.alphabetic(0,arabic) returns the western 0 (no matter what
is the selected language) while converters.alphabetic(1,arabic) gives
the
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 08:25:38PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
core-con.mkiv 20: \def\abjadnumerals
#1{\ctxlua{converters.arabicnumerals(\number#1)}}
core-con.mkiv 21: \def\abjadnodotnumerals
#1{\ctxlua{converters.arabicnodotnumerals(\number#1)}}
core-con.mkiv 22:
It seems that there is a bug in converters.alphabetic function,
converters.alphabetic(0,arabic) returns the western 0 (no matter what
is the selected language) while converters.alphabetic(1,arabic) gives
the Arabic 0 not 1 and so one i.e. it looks like as if it starts
counting from zero.
This
