On 11/4/20 8:41 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
>
> For some unknown reason despite having tried to update lmtx several
> times, I still have version 2020.09.20 23:02.
Hi Otared,
this is exactly the same version I have.
> Indeed I do a backup before any update in order to be able to go
>
Hi Pablo,
For some unknown reason despite having tried to update lmtx several times, I
still have version 2020.09.20 23:02.
Indeed I do a backup before any update in order to be able to go back to a
working version…
What did you do in order to get version 2020.11.04 09:40 ?
Best regards:
On 11/4/20 4:18 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
>
> I get the same result as you. I think the reason is that Hans has not
> yet issued a newer version (he said in a message a few days ago that
> by mistake he might have uploaded a new version, but that we should
> be careful not to update
Hi Pablo,
I get the same result as you. I think the reason is that Hans has not yet
issued a newer version (he said in a message a few days ago that by mistake he
might have uploaded a new version, but that we should be careful not to update
yet…).
Best regards: Otared
> On 4 Nov 2020, at
Here a fresh standalone installed an hour ago doesn't seem to have the
problem.
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 at 16:11, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> after latest from 2020.09.20, I afraid I get this error when running
> install.sh on Linux or install.bat on Windows (both 64bit):
>
> mtx-install
Dear list,
after latest from 2020.09.20, I afraid I get this error when running
install.sh on Linux or install.bat on Windows (both 64bit):
mtx-install | updating tex/texmf, 1541 files
mtx-install | updating tex/texmf-context, 3757 files
mtx-install | changed : 0 % :24110 :
