This appears to be the same as the problem Peter Münster found with the letter
module
\usemodule[database]
\defineseparatedlist[MyTable]
[separator=tab,
before=\bTABLE,after=\eTABLE,
first=\bTR,last=\eTR,
left=\bTD,right=\eTD]
\starttext
The first letter of
On 6/25/2014 7:21 PM, Michael Green wrote:
This appears to be the same as the problem Peter Münster found with the letter
module
\usemodule[database]
\defineseparatedlist[MyTable]
[separator=tab,
before=\bTABLE,after=\eTABLE,
first=\bTR,last=\eTR,
Am 25.06.2014 um 21:44 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl:
On 6/25/2014 7:21 PM, Michael Green wrote:
This appears to be the same as the problem Peter Münster found with the
letter module
\usemodule[database]
\defineseparatedlist[MyTable]
[separator=tab,
On 6/25/2014 11:13 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 25.06.2014 um 21:44 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl
mailto:pra...@wxs.nl:
On 6/25/2014 7:21 PM, Michael Green wrote:
This appears to be the same as the problem Peter Münster found with
the letter module
\usemodule[database]
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Hans Hagen wrote:
but I’m interested what’s the purpose of the fifth argument for
\buff_start_indeed.
that was wrong; the pickup macro has a fifth argument (\plusone here) but
goes unnoticed when you add \obeylines in which case the first 'obeyedline'
ended up in #5
On 2014-06-25 19:04, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/25/2014 11:13 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 25.06.2014 um 21:44 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl
mailto:pra...@wxs.nl:
On 6/25/2014 7:21 PM, Michael Green wrote:
This appears to be the same as the problem Peter Münster found with
the letter
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014, Rik Kabel wrote:
As I wrote before, I do not have a way to more extensively test the other
effects of the change.
Since this affects grabbuffer, it will also affect the filter module. I
have an extensive set of tests for the filter module
Am 26.06.2014 um 01:19 schrieb Rik Kabel cont...@rik.users.panix.com:
Adding \obeylines as Wolfgang indicated did not resolve the issue with my
test case (shortened below), while removing #5 as Hans suggested does resolve
it.
There is a difference between
\startFOO
…
\stopFOO
and
On 2014-06-25 19:34, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 26.06.2014 um 01:19 schrieb Rik Kabel cont...@rik.users.panix.com:
Adding \obeylines as Wolfgang indicated did not resolve the issue with my test
case (shortened below), while removing #5 as Hans suggested does resolve it.
There is a
