Alexandre Christe via ntg-context schrieb am 07.11.2022 um 21:04:
Dear list,
Is there a trick to not apply the leftoffset to the header of a
defineenumeration?
MWE:
[...]
You can use \offset to shift the enumeration title.
\defineframed
[ExampleHeadFrame]
[location=low,
background=
Dear list,
Is there a trick to not apply the leftoffset to the header of a
defineenumeration?
MWE:
\definetextbackground
[textFrameEx]
[
frame=off,
framecolor=darkgreen,
rulethickness=2ex,
background=,
location=paragraph,
leftoffset=2.25ex,
rightoffset=2.25ex,
Hi.
2010/1/5 Wolfgang Schuster :
>
> Am 05.01.2010 um 14:56 schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
>
Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
recently.
>>>
>>> Add 'headalign=flushright'.
>>>
>> Hm, this
Am 05.01.2010 um 14:56 schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
>>> Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
>>> work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
>>> recently.
>>
>> Add 'headalign=flushright'.
>>
> Hm, this gives more unpleasant result for MKIV for
Hello.
2010/1/5 Curiouslearn :
> Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
> work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
> recently.
Sorry, I didn't try to check texexec (MKII) also I just checked context (MKIV).
>
> Can someone please throw light
Thanks! That worked great.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
>
> Am 05.01.2010 um 14:22 schrieb Curiouslearn:
>
>> Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
>> work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
>> recently.
>
> Ad
Am 05.01.2010 um 14:22 schrieb Curiouslearn:
> Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
> work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
> recently.
Add 'headalign=flushright'.
Wolfgang
___
Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
recently.
Can someone please throw light on this? Is the disapperance of the
numbers, as Vladimir suggests, expected behavior of the minimal
example in MKIV.
Hi.
I'm newbie with ConTeXt but have experience with LaTeX.
2010/1/5 Curiouslearn :
> Minimal example
>
> \setuppapersize[letter][letter]
>
> \starttext
> \defineenumeration[problem][text= ,location=inleft]
> \setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)]
>
> \problem
> problem 1
>
>
> \problem
> problem
Minimal example
\setuppapersize[letter][letter]
\starttext
\defineenumeration[problem][text= ,location=inleft]
\setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)]
\problem
problem 1
\problem
problem 2
\stoptext
In MKIV there are numbers do not appear.
Thanks.
Thanks Luigi,
the minimals-current works like accepted.
Regards,
Bernd
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Bernd Militzer wrote:
> Thanks luigi,
>
>
>>> LuaTeX, Version beta-0.43.0-2009081911
>>> ConTeXt ver: 2009.08.30 12:25 MKIV fmt: 2009.9.7 int: english/english
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ConTeXt ver: 2009.08.13 13:13 MKIV fmt: 2009.8.19 int: english/english
>> This is LuaTeX
Thanks luigi,
LuaTeX, Version beta-0.43.0-2009081911
ConTeXt ver: 2009.08.30 12:25 MKIV fmt: 2009.9.7 int: english/english
ConTeXt ver: 2009.08.13 13:13 MKIV fmt: 2009.8.19 int: english/english
This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.43.0-2009081911
but I have no idea, what to do.
Reg
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Bernd Militzer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> \in[ref] does not work with
> LuaTeX, Version beta-0.43.0-2009081911
> ConTeXt ver: 2009.08.30 12:25 MKIV fmt: 2009.9.7 int: english/english
>
> % ---> snip
> %
> \defineenumeration[frage][location=inleft,text=,stopper=.,headsty
Hi all,
\in[ref] does not work with
LuaTeX, Version beta-0.43.0-2009081911
ConTeXt ver: 2009.08.30 12:25 MKIV fmt: 2009.9.7 int: english/english
% ---> snip
%
\defineenumeration[frage][location=inleft,text=,stopper=.,headstyle=bold]
%
%
\starttext
%
Anzahl der Aufgaben: \in[last]
\blank
\sta
\setupenumerations[subRemark][text=subRemark]
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:42:41AM +, batela wrote:
>
>
> Dear Sirs,
>
> I need to define a enumeration with the text label = "Remark". For that I
> define \defineenumeration[Remark][text=Remark]. The label for the subRemark
> should be "subRem
Dear Sirs,
I need to define a enumeration with the text label = "Remark". For
that I define \defineenumeration[Remark][text=Remark]. The label for
the subRemark should be "subRemark". Is there a easy way to do that?
The subRemark is a son of Remark and the numeration expected is:
Remark
WN wrote:
> I am a bit confused, the example setups the enumaration *remark* and
> specifies the location=top
>
> But on page 224 the command \setupenumerations is shown where one can also
> specify the location among others.
>
> What is the difference, reason or usage for doing this ?
Much of
Hi,
I have a question (probably a dumb question) relating to some of the
define/setup commands. One in
particular, but it may relate to the other define/setup commands as
well.
Looking at the defineenumeration and setupenumerations command
in the Context manual page 223 and page 224 an exampl
Christopher Creutzig wrote:
Hans,
either \defineenumeration is broken in , or I always used it
incorrectly:
\defineenumeration[definition]
[sectionnumber=chapter,
text=Definition,
location=hanging,
way=bychapter]
\star
Hans,
either \defineenumeration is broken in , or I always used it incorrectly:
\defineenumeration[definition]
[sectionnumber=chapter,
text=Definition,
location=hanging,
way=bychapter]
\starttext
\startdefinition
Test
\s
At 11:19 20/09/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Hi,
Thanks Hans for the patch concerning enumerations. - Certain things now work
as I thought they should, others don't . :-(
In the meantime I downloaded and installed the latest (yesterdays) CONTeXT.
1. Numbering starts at 2, and the following items get nu
Hi,
Thanks Hans for the patch concerning enumerations. - Certain things now work
as I thought they should, others don't . :-(
In the meantime I downloaded and installed the latest (yesterdays) CONTeXT.
1. Numbering starts at 2, and the following items get numberd 4,6,
2. I detected, that the op
23 matches
Mail list logo