[this bounced before, I think due to disk space being used up on the
mailman server. Hopefully you don't get it twice]
Wolfgang Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I played yesterday I bit with your example and can you give now
> a solution for your problem.
At first I thought I'd need to
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:36:33 +0100
Sanjoy Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It works for me if put a \par or a empty line after the first
> > \input.
>
> That's true, but doing so ends the paragraph. Shouldn't the displayed
> math be part of the paragraph? The \input tufte's were just to m
> It works for me if put a \par or a empty line after the first
> \input.
That's true, but doing so ends the paragraph. Shouldn't the displayed
math be part of the paragraph? The \input tufte's were just to make
the minimal example. It came from a paragraph with text and math that
begins with a
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 01:15:35 -0400
Sanjoy Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the following small example, two squares are cut out of the long
> paragraph. The first is where the external figure belongs and goes, so
> no problem with that. But the second removed square is after the
> display
In the following small example, two squares are cut out of the long
paragraph. The first is where the external figure belongs and goes, so
no problem with that. But the second removed square is after the
displayed equation, and it shouldn't be removed. If I comment out the
formula, then the para