Re: [NTG-context] displayed formula confuses parshape around figure

2006-09-21 Thread Sanjoy Mahajan
[this bounced before, I think due to disk space being used up on the mailman server. Hopefully you don't get it twice] Wolfgang Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I played yesterday I bit with your example and can you give now > a solution for your problem. At first I thought I'd need to

Re: [NTG-context] displayed formula confuses parshape around figure

2006-09-21 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:36:33 +0100 Sanjoy Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It works for me if put a \par or a empty line after the first > > \input. > > That's true, but doing so ends the paragraph. Shouldn't the displayed > math be part of the paragraph? The \input tufte's were just to m

Re: [NTG-context] displayed formula confuses parshape around figure

2006-09-20 Thread Sanjoy Mahajan
> It works for me if put a \par or a empty line after the first > \input. That's true, but doing so ends the paragraph. Shouldn't the displayed math be part of the paragraph? The \input tufte's were just to make the minimal example. It came from a paragraph with text and math that begins with a

Re: [NTG-context] displayed formula confuses parshape around figure

2006-09-20 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 01:15:35 -0400 Sanjoy Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the following small example, two squares are cut out of the long > paragraph. The first is where the external figure belongs and goes, so > no problem with that. But the second removed square is after the > display

[NTG-context] displayed formula confuses parshape around figure

2006-09-19 Thread Sanjoy Mahajan
In the following small example, two squares are cut out of the long paragraph. The first is where the external figure belongs and goes, so no problem with that. But the second removed square is after the displayed equation, and it shouldn't be removed. If I comment out the formula, then the para