Dear Aditya, Jairo, Wolfgang, and Otared,
Thank you for the replies and explanations.
I also read the blog.
In this case, using '##1’ is an easy way.
For more complex table, I may use luacode.
Thanks again.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
___
Jeong Dal schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 20:54:
Dear Aditya, Jairo, Wolfgang, and Otared,
Thank you for the replies and explanations.
I also read the blog.
In this case, using '##1’ is an easy way.
For more complex table, I may use luacode.
I forgot the obvious \expanded solution:
\starttext
\s
Hi,
I tried to make a table using \dorecurse or \doloop as in the example.
There is no error but \recurselevel is not increased, all are 0 in the first
example and only two rows are created with the \recurselevel 0 and 2 only in
the second example.
Does the tabulate cause the error?
What is wro
> On 21 Sep 2020, at 16:42, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
>> Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 16:35:
>>> […]
>
> You gave the same reply 11 years ago :-) which is also listed in the blog
> post.
… Which shows that some things don't change in
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 16:35:
> > On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jeong Dal wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I tried to make a table using \dorecurse or \doloop as in the example.
> > > There is no error but \recurselevel is not increased, al
Hi Dalyoung,
I don't know why \recurselevel returns 0 inside a tabulate environment, but the
following works fine:
\starttext
\startxtable[frame=off,bottomframe=on,width=1cm,align={middle,lohi}]
\startxrow\startxcell \stopxcell\stopxrow % just to have a line on the top of
the first row
\dorecur
Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 16:35:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jeong Dal wrote:
Hi,
I tried to make a table using \dorecurse or \doloop as in the example.
There is no error but \recurselevel is not increased, all are 0 in the first
example and only two rows are created with the \recursel
Hi,
Using ##1 instead of \recurselevel makes it work in this specific case if
you want a quick and dirty solution. It seems to be a thing with nesting,
as using #1 complains. I'd prefer the solutions as shown by Aditya:
constructing tables via Lua, etc.
Regards,
Jairo
El lun., 21 de sep. de 202
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jeong Dal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to make a table using \dorecurse or \doloop as in the example.
> There is no error but \recurselevel is not increased, all are 0 in the first
> example and only two rows are created with the \recurselevel 0 and 2 only in
> the second examp
> On 20 Jan 2017, at 18:00, Rik Kabel wrote:
> […]
>
> Otared,
>
> I am not sure what you are doing, but if you are using only the code snippet
> that Hans posted, you will get a blank page. You have to define the layer and
> page background in addition to Hans' snippet.
Oh yes… sorry, I am
On 2017-01-20 11:42, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
Unfortunately your workaround with \getbuffer does not produce the correct
page: it gives only a blank page.
Thanks for your attention: OK
On 20 Jan 2017, at 10:08, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/20/2017 8:59 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 19
Hi Hans,
Unfortunately your workaround with \getbuffer does not produce the correct
page: it gives only a blank page.
Thanks for your attention: OK
> On 20 Jan 2017, at 10:08, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 1/20/2017 8:59 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Rik Kabel wrote:
>>
>>> Co
On 1/20/2017 8:59 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Rik Kabel wrote:
ConTeXters,
When \dorecurse is active in the following MWE, the lines of text are
overprinted. At least, this is the case for me, please confirm it for
yourself. When \dorecurse is disabled, the lines print as th
On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Rik Kabel wrote:
ConTeXters,
When \dorecurse is active in the following MWE, the lines of text are
overprinted. At least, this is the case for me, please confirm it for
yourself. When \dorecurse is disabled, the lines print as they should,
separately. Please tell me what
Hi Rik,
I can confirm the behaviour you are reporting (even without
\startstandardmakeup—\stopstandardmakeup, but adding a line of text in the
document in order to have an output).
It seems that \dorecurse suppresses the passage to another line, since if one
says \dorecurse{10} the texts in the
ConTeXters,
When \dorecurse is active in the following MWE, the lines of text are
overprinted. At least, this is the case for me, please confirm it for
yourself. When \dorecurse is disabled, the lines print as they should,
separately. Please tell me what I am doing wrong with this, if anything
16 matches
Mail list logo
