With the following setup my endnotes show up in the list with [number], as I
would like to have it. But in the text they do not appear as [number] but just
as plain numbers.
Why does textcommand has not this effect, whereas numbercommand does? The
manual strongly suggest this to me.
Am 17.04.2013 um 20:23 schrieb Meer, H. van der h.vanderm...@uva.nl:
With the following setup my endnotes show up in the list with [number], as I
would like to have it. But in the text they do not appear as [number] but
just as plain numbers.
Why does textcommand has not this effect,
On 4/17/2013 8:27 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 17.04.2013 um 20:23 schrieb Meer, H. van der h.vanderm...@uva.nl:
With the following setup my endnotes show up in the list with [number], as I
would like to have it. But in the text they do not appear as [number] but just
as plain numbers.
A minor point perhaps on this textcommand= \groupedcommand for the marking of
the notes in the text. I tried this but now the marking is not typeset as a
superscript.
Hans van der Meer
On 17 Apr 2013, at 9:28 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl
wrote:
On 4/17/2013 8:27 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
Am 17.04.2013 um 21:35 schrieb Meer, H. van der h.vanderm...@uva.nl:
A minor point perhaps on this textcommand= \groupedcommand for the marking of
the notes in the text. I tried this but now the marking is not typeset as a
superscript.
\defineprocessor[footnote][left={[},right={]}]
