Re: [NTG-context] example of better linebreak with 2014.05.17 compared to 2014.07.07

2014-07-10 Thread Hans Hagen
On 7/10/2014 5:06 AM, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: Hans Hagen writes: it can happen if patterns or fonts changed ...so, best make two small test files and we can look into it with tracing There's just one test file for both (see below). I think I verified that the texgyrepagella font is the same i

Re: [NTG-context] example of better linebreak with 2014.05.17 compared to 2014.07.07

2014-07-09 Thread Sanjoy Mahajan
Hans Hagen writes: > it can happen if patterns or fonts changed ...so, best make two small > test files and we can look into it with tracing There's just one test file for both (see below). I think I verified that the texgyrepagella font is the same in both context minimals. But maybe the hyp

Re: [NTG-context] example of better linebreak with 2014.05.17 compared to 2014.07.07

2014-07-09 Thread Hans Hagen
On 7/9/2014 12:39 PM, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: Out of curiosity and as a ConTeXt stress test, I installed 2014.07.07 MkIV and recompiled my book with it, and looked at the pixel-by-pixel comparison between it and the version compiled with 2014.05.17. There were many changes. I am going through the

[NTG-context] example of better linebreak with 2014.05.17 compared to 2014.07.07

2014-07-09 Thread Sanjoy Mahajan
Out of curiosity and as a ConTeXt stress test, I installed 2014.07.07 MkIV and recompiled my book with it, and looked at the pixel-by-pixel comparison between it and the version compiled with 2014.05.17. There were many changes. I am going through them one at a time in case any could be bugs in l