Dear gang,
Design sizes for typefaces -- aka "optical sizes" -- are no longer directly
implemented in typescripts. From the manual Fonts out of ConTeXt by Hans Hagen,
p. 109:
"at some point the decision was made to kick out these definitions and move the
burden of figuring out the right size t
Am 10.06.23 um 19:46 schrieb Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 10:06 AM Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
wrote:
Hi, this is probably for Hans & Mikael, but maybe someone else has a hint:
If I set a fallback for my body font to catch all missing characters,
some
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 10:06 AM Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
wrote:
>
> Hi, this is probably for Hans & Mikael, but maybe someone else has a hint:
>
> If I set a fallback for my body font to catch all missing characters,
> some math accents get replaced by small bold uppercase charact
Hi, this is probably for Hans & Mikael, but maybe someone else has a hint:
If I set a fallback for my body font to catch all missing characters,
some math accents get replaced by small bold uppercase characters (I
found hat by K and ring by T so far).
I tried [fallbacks=] for math to no avail
I believe it's a bug.
https://github.com/contextgarden/context/blob/d025bcdf995be6951f69fed6869048ab22491b9e/tex/context/base/mkxl/font-col.lmt#L278
the newchar[] table, which should contain all chars supported by the
fallback termes font if I'm not mistaken, turns out to have only 392 chars
with
Thank you, Pablo, but that doesn't help. I know how to use fallback
fonts. I was wondering if the check key is working as it should.
Thomas
On 4/22/23 20:33, Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I don’t know what check does (maybe just check?), but the standard
behaviour with \de
On 4/22/23 18:05, Thomas A. Schmitz via ntg-context wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> today, I was struggling with a fallback font I had defined, and I
> discovered that the key "check" doesn't work as I expected.
> [...]
> If I have "check=no," the characters are taken from termes and replaced.
> I was und
Hi all,
today, I was struggling with a fallback font I had defined, and I
discovered that the key "check" doesn't work as I expected. Here's a
small example:
\definefallbackfamily [presentation] [serif] [TeXGyreTermes]
[range=0x2329-0x232A,check=yes]
\definefontfamily [presentation] [serif]
Hello,
I like to use Latin Modern Math as my math font but it lacks some glyphs
like \cong=0x02245. I would like to know (if possible, with a working
example) if font fallbacks feature is available for math fonts.
Mehdi
___
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2008, at 11:26 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> the answer to this one may be completely obvious, but I haven't found
>>> anything: I know we can define fallb
On Oct 16, 2008, at 11:26 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> the answer to this one may be completely obvious, but I haven't found
>> anything: I know we can define fallback fonts in mkiv, but is it
>> po
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the answer to this one may be completely obvious, but I haven't found
> anything: I know we can define fallback fonts in mkiv, but is it
> possible to define fallbacks for single characters. Let's take 0x011
Hi all,
the answer to this one may be completely obvious, but I haven't found
anything: I know we can define fallback fonts in mkiv, but is it
possible to define fallbacks for single characters. Let's take 0x0113,
"emacron." Is it possible to define "if character is present in
current font
13 matches
Mail list logo
