Re: [NTG-context] fontvariants

2005-12-04 Thread Hans Hagen
Adam Lindsay wrote: Hans van der Meer wrote: I was probing into the font variant mechanism. QUESTION: Is the variant mechanism exclusively tied to the series Serif (\rm) and Sans (\ss)? Yes, pretty much, in the implementation's design. more precisely, it;s related to rm|ss|tt (mapped

[NTG-context] fontvariants

2005-12-03 Thread Hans van der Meer
I was probing into the font variant mechanism. This did not work, th Light font could not be made to typeset: \starttypescript [calligraphy] [mathtimeyy] [name] \definefontsynonym [CalligraphyRegular] [Calligraphy] \definefontsynonym [Calligraphy] [MathTimes-Calligraphy]

Re: [NTG-context] fontvariants

2005-12-03 Thread Adam Lindsay
Hans van der Meer wrote: I was probing into the font variant mechanism. QUESTION: Is the variant mechanism exclusively tied to the series Serif (\rm) and Sans (\ss)? Yes, pretty much, in the implementation's design. If otherwise, what am I doing wrong then? Nothing. Except, is that Math