On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
>
> Am 23.01.2012 um 22:47 schrieb Peter Park Nelson:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Maybe this is related to the problems with \definenote posted
>> recently...I have played with setups but have been unable to figure
>> this one out.
>
> It was \setupn
Am 23.01.2012 um 22:47 schrieb Peter Park Nelson:
> Hello,
>
> Maybe this is related to the problems with \definenote posted
> recently...I have played with setups but have been unable to figure
> this one out.
It was \setupnote and this problem is fixed.
> I have a custom enumeration environm
Hello,
Maybe this is related to the problems with \definenote posted
recently...I have played with setups but have been unable to figure
this one out.
I have a custom enumeration environment to display the names of
journal authors in a paragraph format, with local footnotes for their
affiliations
Hi,
what happened with footnote number 3 and 5?
In MkIV their marker are gone ...
\starttext
test\footnote[a]{text} test.
test\note[b]\footnotetext[b]{text} test.
test\footnote[x]{text} test.
test\note[d]\footnotetext[d]{text} test.
test\footnote[y]{text} test.
\stoptext
Steffen
At 00:09 07/12/2003, you wrote:
Hi,
while desperately working on footnote markers I found this email from 9
months ago.
Is there in the meanwhile some news for a kind of "\setupfootnotemarker"?
what exactly do you want to achieve? one can influence footnote markers
using the conversion key
\set
Hi,
while desperately working on footnote markers I found this email from 9 months ago.
Is there in the meanwhile some news for a kind of "\setupfootnotemarker"?
Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 04:12 PM 2/14/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >Hmm...maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me these
