Am 07.10.2014 um 09:20 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl:
On 10/7/2014 7:33 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
\setupmathradical[alternative=default]
Very good!
Hans, will the default be default in next
On 10/7/2014 7:33 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
\setupmathradical[alternative=default]
Very good!
Hans, will the default be default in next beta? :)
no, but there will be different settings ... the
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Is this (see frac.pdf) the expected output of \frac and \tfrac in
combination with \sqrt? To me the \sqrt{3} looks too big in \tfrac.
I attach also the output from the corresponding latex document, having
the
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Is this (see frac.pdf) the expected output of \frac and \tfrac in
combination with \sqrt? To me the \sqrt{3} looks too big in \tfrac.
I attach also the output from
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
\setupmathradical[alternative=default]
Very good!
Hans, will the default be default in next beta? :)
Best regards, Mikael
___
If
Hi!
Is this (see frac.pdf) the expected output of \frac and \tfrac in
combination with \sqrt? To me the \sqrt{3} looks too big in \tfrac.
I attach also the output from the corresponding latex document, having
the result I expect.
Best regards, Mikael
PS Compilation done with latest standalone
