hi,
1.
what's the equivalent of the \usepackage{fullpage} for ConTeXt?
2.
it would be convenient if LuaTeX supported typescripts like XeTeX does
instead of having to define font synonyms, e.g.,
\definetypeface[mainface][rm][Xserif][Warnock Pro]
\definetypeface[mainface][ss][Xsans][Cronos
Am 23.12.2008 um 18:44 schrieb Mohamed Bana:
hi,
1.
what's the equivalent of the \usepackage{fullpage} for ConTeXt?
Tell us next time what a package is supposed to do.
\setuplayout
[backspace=1in,
width=middle,
topspace=1in,
header=0pt,
footer=0pt,
height=middle]
Am 23.12.2008 um 18:44 schrieb Mohamed Bana:
hi,
1.
what's the equivalent of the \usepackage{fullpage} for ConTeXt?
file name=example.tex
\usemodule[fullpage][style={cm,empty}]
%\showframe
\starttext
\input knuth
\stoptext
/file
file name=p-fullpage.tex
%D \module
%D [
Concerning the second question, the following is the reply from Hans
months ago to me.
I think Hans is right, since fonts are quite complex, but it *will* be
a lot easier if we have that mechanism since this mechanism will be
applicable to most fonts.
If there are fonts that fontconfig cannot
