Re: [NTG-context] installation: "-jobname" pdfetex option

2003-10-23 Thread Ed L Cashin
Ed L Cashin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ... > Texexec still just shows a usage message. I bet I have to change > something in texexec.ini, but I couldn't find it last time I looked. > I'll look again. > > Now by doing "pdfetex \&cont-en test.tex" I'm able to see the example > that made me want

Re: [NTG-context] installation: "-jobname" pdfetex option (was Re: [NTG-context] columns and alignment at the bottom)

2003-10-19 Thread Hans Hagen
At 16:26 17/10/2003, you wrote: I looked around a bit in the archives, but I'm not sure which zip that is, so I decided to go ahead and upgrade my whole tetex to 2.0.2. I went to pragma-ade and followed the links to find pdftex 14h. http://www.pragma-ade.com/context/linuxtex.zip to give you so

Re: [NTG-context] installation: "-jobname" pdfetex option

2003-10-17 Thread Ed L Cashin
Ed L Cashin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ... > Just to see what would happen, I then got pdftex 14h and unzipped it > in the bin dir, moving the pool files to texmf/web2c. Then I did > mktexlsr and fmtutil --all, but I see this error message in the > output: > > running `pdfetex -ini -jobname

[NTG-context] installation: "-jobname" pdfetex option (was Re: [NTG-context] columns and alignment at the bottom)

2003-10-17 Thread Ed L Cashin
Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 18:54 15/10/2003, you wrote: > >>TeXExec 3.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2003 > > this should be no problem but we have 4.0 now > >This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.14159-13d-2.1 (Web2C 7.3.1) >> entering extended mode > > but version 13d is asking fo