On Sun, 8 Sep 2019, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Aditya,
I wanted also to point out a typo on that page (two occurrences), namely
"ploles" instead of "poles", in the explanations before the actual code.
Thanks. Fixed.
Aditya
Hi Aditya,
As usual you show us a very nice and very clear example to taech nice features
of ConTeXt: thank you so much!
I wanted also to point out a typo on that page (two occurrences), namely
"ploles" instead of "poles", in the explanations before the actual code.
Best regard:
> On 8 Sep
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hi,
In the process of providing an additional (more abstract) interface to
some of the old and also new MetaFun code we wonder what kind of
features users would like to see.
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/magazines/mag-1104-mkiv.pdf
Finally got
Thanks a lot for the new features.
In my system this code don’t work.
macOS Mojave
This is LuaMetaTeX, Version 2.00.0
open source > level 1, order 1, name 'cont-yes.mkiv'
system >
system > ConTeXt ver: 2019.08.17 12:16 MKIV beta fmt: 2019.8.19
int: English/English
Hi Hans, Alan,
This is really cool! Not sure how I missed this feature, works exactly for
my use-case.
Thanks a lot for pointing this out, I was able to find it in the MAPS as
well.
Cheers,
Adam
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 9:52 AM Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 8/17/2019 3:27 AM, Alan Braslau wrote:
> >
On 8/17/2019 3:27 AM, Alan Braslau wrote:
We have eofill in MP (in pdf/ps in fact) and that likely will do what you need.
You forgot the MWD (Minimal Working Demo):
\starttext
\startMPpage
path p ; p := fullcircle scaled 1cm ;
path q ; q := fullcircle scaled .5cm ;
nofill p ;
eofill q ;
We have eofill in MP (in pdf/ps in fact) and that likely will do what you need.
Alan
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 00:31:38 +0100
Adam Reviczky wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> One MetaPost feature that I was looking forward to is the ability to create
> a fill between two shapes.
> Something like a difference
Hi Hans,
One MetaPost feature that I was looking forward to is the ability to create
a fill between two shapes.
Something like a difference function of two path's.
For logos I use the workaround with creating a path alongside the excluded
areas but it is always cumbersome.
I have briefly
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:18:19PM +1200, Henri Menke wrote:
> I just wanted to ask, will LMTX and MetaFun remain valid implementations
> of TeX and MetaPost or do we have to expect incompatibilities?
If you mean “will luametatex pass the trip test”, the answer is
probably no: LuaTeX already
On 8/14/2019 4:58 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
1) 3d support. This is of course a very big request, but it would also
be useful for many people.
yes ... Alan and I are thinking of some (not that we came far yet)
2) About graphing, it would be nice to be able to do contour polots and
On 8/14/2019 4:58 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
On 14 Aug 2019, at 16:53, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
[…]
This looks like a typical .. vs -- issue. I think there is a way to change how
the points are connected, but I'll have to look at the code again.
Aditya
Indeed, this seems the right
Otared Kavian schrieb am 14.08.2019 um 16:58:
On 14 Aug 2019, at 16:53, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
[…]
This looks like a typical .. vs -- issue. I think there is a way to change how
the points are connected, but I'll have to look at the code again.
Aditya
Indeed, this seems the right
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:55 AM Hans Hagen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the process of providing an additional (more abstract) interface to
> some of the old and also new MetaFun code we wonder what kind of
> features users would like to see.
>
>
> On 14 Aug 2019, at 16:53, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> […]
> This looks like a typical .. vs -- issue. I think there is a way to change
> how the points are connected, but I'll have to look at the code again.
>
> Aditya
Indeed, this seems the right explanation.
@ Hans: would it be possible
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
Thank you very much for the new features! I haven't yet read all the
mag-1104-mkiv.pdf where you explain some of them, but after modifying one of
your examples, I noticed that some funtions get a strange graph, which is
probably due to the
On 8/14/2019 4:22 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
Thank you very much for the new features! I haven't yet read all the
mag-1104-mkiv.pdf where you explain some of them, but after modifying one of
your examples, I noticed that some funtions get a strange graph, which is
probably due to the
Hi Hans,
Thank you very much for the new features! I haven't yet read all the
mag-1104-mkiv.pdf where you explain some of them, but after modifying one of
your examples, I noticed that some funtions get a strange graph, which is
probably due to the fact that metafun2 is interpolating between
On 8/14/2019 1:31 PM, Floris van Manen wrote:
where can i find the steps to install lmtx next to my current context
luatex ?
http://pragma-ade.nl/install.htm
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
where can i find the steps to install lmtx next to my current context
luatex ?
.F
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
On 8/14/2019 12:18 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
Dear Hans,
I just wanted to ask, will LMTX and MetaFun remain valid implementations
of TeX and MetaPost or do we have to expect incompatibilities?
It depends on how you define 'valid' ... we're downward compatible ...
but LMTX will use features
Dear Hans,
I just wanted to ask, will LMTX and MetaFun remain valid implementations
of TeX and MetaPost or do we have to expect incompatibilities?
Cheers, Henri
On 14/08/19 9:54 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the process of providing an additional (more abstract) interface to
> some of
Hi,
In the process of providing an additional (more abstract) interface to
some of the old and also new MetaFun code we wonder what kind of
features users would like to see.
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/magazines/mag-1104-mkiv.pdf
As a teaser I uploaded a MyWay document that shows some
22 matches
Mail list logo
