Re: [NTG-context] more xml in mkiv

2008-07-14 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Jul 14, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > Can you test the following definition for item a while: > > \startxmlsetups xml:item > \startitem > \xmlflush{#1} > \stopitem > \stopxmlsetups > > Regards, > Wolfgang I have something very similar in my environment: \startxmlsetups x

Re: [NTG-context] more xml in mkiv

2008-07-14 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 14.07.2008 um 16:45 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz: > Hi all, > > I'm resurrecting an old thread and top-posting... For details, see > the post below. The problem was that the content of itemizations > sometimes disappeared in xml processed by mkiv. I emphasize > "sometimes": now you see it, no

Re: [NTG-context] more xml in mkiv

2008-07-14 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
Hi all, I'm resurrecting an old thread and top-posting... For details, see the post below. The problem was that the content of itemizations sometimes disappeared in xml processed by mkiv. I emphasize "sometimes": now you see it, now you don't... I can't really post a minimal example th

Re: [NTG-context] more xml in mkiv

2008-03-25 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > On Mar 25, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Peter Rolf wrote: >> your original example works here too. today's context and latest >> luatex. >> >> hth, peter > > Wait wait wait ... you mean you get correct output with the example I > posted in this thread? In that case, I'm complet

Re: [NTG-context] more xml in mkiv

2008-03-25 Thread Peter Rolf
Thomas A. Schmitz schrieb: > > On Mar 25, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Peter Rolf wrote: >>> Wait wait wait ... you mean you get correct output with the example >>> I posted in this thread? In that case, I'm completely baffled, >>> because I get something like this >>> >> see yourself and beleave ;) > i

Re: [NTG-context] more xml in mkiv

2008-03-25 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Mar 25, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Peter Rolf wrote: Wait wait wait ... you mean you get correct output with the example I posted in this thread? In that case, I'm completely baffled, because I get something like this see yourself and beleave ;) Hey, I'm quite willing to believe - but now I

Re: [NTG-context] more xml in mkiv

2008-03-25 Thread Peter Rolf
Thomas A. Schmitz schrieb: On Mar 25, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Peter Rolf wrote: your original example works here too. today's context and latest luatex. hth, peter Wait wait wait ... you mean you get correct output with the example I posted in this thread? In that case, I'm completely baffled,

Re: [NTG-context] more xml in mkiv

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I played some more with the new mkiv xml mechanism and am beginning to > see the light: some things that turned out to be very difficult (at > least for me) with the "old" mechanism are easy now. However, I

Re: [NTG-context] more xml in mkiv

2008-03-25 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Mar 25, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Peter Rolf wrote: > your original example works here too. today's context and latest > luatex. > > hth, peter Wait wait wait ... you mean you get correct output with the example I posted in this thread? In that case, I'm completely baffled, because I get somethi

Re: [NTG-context] more xml in mkiv

2008-03-25 Thread Peter Rolf
Thomas A. Schmitz schrieb: > On Mar 25, 2008, at 1:42 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Mar 24, 2008, at 11:34 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: works here, just to be sure i uploaded a new current Hans >>

Re: [NTG-context] more xml in mkiv

2008-03-25 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Mar 25, 2008, at 1:42 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Mar 24, 2008, at 11:34 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> works here, just to be sure i uploaded a new current >>> >>> Hans >>> >> >> Thanks Hans! You're right; I

Re: [NTG-context] more xml in mkiv

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2008, at 11:34 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > > works here, just to be sure i uploaded a new current > > > > Hans > > > > Thanks Hans! You're right; I worked on a minimal example for a long > time and got confused

Re: [NTG-context] more xml in mkiv

2008-03-25 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Mar 24, 2008, at 11:34 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > works here, just to be sure i uploaded a new current > > Hans > Thanks Hans! You're right; I worked on a minimal example for a long time and got confused. I tried again; this example demonstrates the behavior (I tested on two different compute

Re: [NTG-context] more xml in mkiv

2008-03-24 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > Hi all, > > I played some more with the new mkiv xml mechanism and am beginning to > see the light: some things that turned out to be very difficult (at > least for me) with the "old" mechanism are easy now. However, I still > have a couple of questions: works her

[NTG-context] more xml in mkiv

2008-03-24 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
Hi all, I played some more with the new mkiv xml mechanism and am beginning to see the light: some things that turned out to be very difficult (at least for me) with the "old" mechanism are easy now. However, I still have a couple of questions: 1. I have this minimal file test.xml: