Re: [NTG-context] new feature

2005-11-13 Thread Hans Hagen
� wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Hans Hagen wrote: A next release will support the setupalign options in align keys (as in \framed): hanging nothanging hz nohz spacing nospacing hyphenated nothyphenated tolerant verytolerant stretch Hello Hans, where could one find some

Re: [NTG-context] new feature

2005-11-13 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Peter Münster wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Hans Hagen wrote: A next release will support the setupalign options in align keys (as in \framed): hanging nothanging hz nohz spacing nospacing hyphenated nothyphenated tolerant verytolerant stretch Hello Hans, where could one find

Re: [NTG-context] new feature

2005-11-12 Thread Peter Münster
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Hans Hagen wrote: > A next release will support the setupalign options in align keys (as in > \framed): > > hanging nothanging > hz nohz > spacing nospacing > hyphenated nothyphenated > tolerant verytolerant stretch Hello Hans, where could one find some docum

[NTG-context] new feature

2005-11-11 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, A next release will support the setupalign options in align keys (as in \framed): hanging nothanging hz nohz spacing nospacing hyphenated nothyphenated tolerant verytolerant stretch \framed[width=5cm,align={normal,stretch,verytolerant}]{\input tufte } this also fulfils a r

Re: [NTG-context] new feature / manual

2005-09-21 Thread Hans Hagen
� wrote: On Sun, 18 Sep 2005, Hans Hagen wrote: concerning the code: interesting mix of scripting an texing-) but beware of redefining externalfigure; there is a hook \externalfigurepostprocessors since conversion normally happens once, the delayed postprocessing is not a real problem; th

Re: [NTG-context] new feature / manual

2005-09-20 Thread Peter Münster
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005, Hans Hagen wrote: > concerning the code: interesting mix of scripting an texing-) but beware > of redefining externalfigure; there is a hook > > \externalfigurepostprocessors > > since conversion normally happens once, the delayed postprocessing is not > a real problem; the

Re: [NTG-context] new feature / manual

2005-09-18 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Münster wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Hans Hagen wrote: Oh, I just wanted to submit a new module (http://pmrb.free.fr/work/OS/ConTeXt/t-degrade.tex) for down-sampling to the community, so this is no more necessary... i can't download the file -) Oh, what is the error-mes

Re: [NTG-context] new feature / manual

2005-09-16 Thread Peter Münster
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Hans Hagen wrote: > >Oh, I just wanted to submit a new module > >(http://pmrb.free.fr/work/OS/ConTeXt/t-degrade.tex) for down-sampling to the > >community, so this is no more necessary... > > > i can't download the file -) Oh, what is the error-message? Peter -- http://p

Re: [NTG-context] new feature / manual

2005-09-15 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Münster wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Hans Hagen wrote: Anyhow, the new feature concerns - graphic manipulations (downsampling and beyond) Oh, I just wanted to submit a new module (http://pmrb.free.fr/work/OS/ConTeXt/t-degrade.tex) for down-sampling to the community, so this is

Re: [NTG-context] new feature / manual

2005-09-15 Thread Peter Münster
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Hans Hagen wrote: > Anyhow, the new feature concerns > > - graphic manipulations (downsampling and beyond) Oh, I just wanted to submit a new module (http://pmrb.free.fr/work/OS/ConTeXt/t-degrade.tex) for down-sampling to the community, so this is no more necessary... Cheers,

Re: [NTG-context] new feature / manual

2005-09-15 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
OK, works like a charm!! On Sep 15, 2005, at 2:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: bin there, done that (with the file you posted yesterday: #!/bin/sh ruby /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/scripts/context/ruby/ texmfstart.rb texexec.pl $@ not texexex.pl but just texexe

Re: [NTG-context] new feature / manual

2005-09-15 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: bin there, done that (with the file you posted yesterday: #!/bin/sh ruby /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/scripts/context/ruby/ texmfstart.rb texexec.pl $@ not texexex.pl but just texexec -

Re: [NTG-context] new feature / manual

2005-09-15 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
bin there, done that (with the file you posted yesterday: #!/bin/sh ruby /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/scripts/context/ruby/ texmfstart.rb texexec.pl $@ Is that the right method? Thomas On Sep 15, 2005, at 1:35 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: then you should replace your stub file ___

Re: [NTG-context] new feature / manual

2005-09-15 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: This doesn't seem to be working here (using OS X + zsh); I always get the "old" texexec. Best Thomas On Sep 14, 2005, at 9:46 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: If you want to automatically run newtexexec instead of texexec, you need to set the environment variable TEXMFSTART

Re: [NTG-context] new feature / manual

2005-09-15 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
This doesn't seem to be working here (using OS X + zsh); I always get the "old" texexec. Best Thomas On Sep 14, 2005, at 9:46 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: If you want to automatically run newtexexec instead of texexec, you need to set the environment variable TEXMFSTART_MODE to 'experimental' _

[NTG-context] new feature / manual

2005-09-14 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, There is a new feature + manual, for those who love obscure mechanisms. http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/xmanipulate.pdf Even if you dislike manipulations ... the manual mixes iwona and the new condensed latin modern monospace font. The preprocess feature is only supported by n