So, to sum up: The tex engines should be accessible via PATH,
OSFONTDIR is really handy; other than that only TEXPATH and TEXMF* are
needed, since "pool files" (whatever they are) are on the way out.
Seems straightforward enough, if that's complete.
Is there any real point to creating an NSIS or
Joel C. Salomon wrote:
> CTXMINIMAL is also not needed?
depends on if it used, not if you go real minimal (more for calling scripts)
> But setuptex still sets these. What does it mean, that TEXPOOL &al.
> aren't needed for luatex/xetex? Does MKII need them?
not related to mkiv/mkii but to eng
On 9/30/07, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So what environment variables can I set globally to avoid the need for
> > running setuptex.bat? My first guess is:
> > SETUPTEX=done
> > CTXMINIMAL=yes
>
> not if setuptex is not used
CTXMINIMAL is also not needed?
> > TEXPATH=C:\..\con
Hello,
> So what environment variables can I set globally to avoid the need for
> running setuptex.bat?
Personally I came to the following set of vars (for luatex):
PATH = G:\rsync\windows\texmf-mswin\bin;
OSFONTDIR = %WINDIR%\Fonts
TEXMF = {g:\rsync\windows\texmf,g:\rsync\windows\texmf-local}
Joel C. Salomon wrote:
> On 9/26/07, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 1) Why we need to set almost all in setuptex.bat, while the same vars
>>> (except Windows' PATH) are already set in texmf.cnf?
>> well, this is not recent, but has aways been the case; in setuptex i
>> make sure that no
On 9/26/07, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) Why we need to set almost all in setuptex.bat, while the same vars
> > (except Windows' PATH) are already set in texmf.cnf?
>
> well, this is not recent, but has aways been the case; in setuptex i
> make sure that no conflicts can arise betw
Hello Hans,
Just noticed that when making formats luatools skips texmf.cnt in both
subtrees. Does it mean that .cnf files are not needed anymore by luatex, and it
relies only on environmental vars?
Best regards,
Vyatcheslav
__
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
> Hello Hans,
>
> Could you please answer my questions about recent Windows minimal?
>
> 1) Why we need to set almost all in setuptex.bat, while the same vars (except
> Windows' PATH) are already set in texmf.cnf?
well, this is not recent, but has aways been the
Hello Hans,
Could you please answer my questions about recent Windows minimal?
1) Why we need to set almost all in setuptex.bat, while the same vars (except
Windows' PATH) are already set in texmf.cnf?
2) How can I get rid of LM (and other) fonts completely? I want to use solely
luatex and s
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Note that also three really important fixes have been added to XeTeX
> recently, so ConTeXt works much better with XeTeX 0.997.
the bottom line is, that we need to make sure that we hav ethe most
recent bins for all platforms before we can generate minimals
> It's the Co
On 9/24/07, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let me ask a few questions:
>
> 1) When "big things" will be regenerated? I'm still waiting for mswincontext
> with updated binaries.
I cannot answer that since it's Hans's decision. But I can assure you
that a lot has been happenng in the m
Hello,
Let me ask a few questions:
1) When "big things" will be regenerated? I'm still waiting for mswincontext
with updated binaries.
2) What is the difference between mswincontext and mswintex packages?
3) If someone made mswincontext to work with latest updates, can he or she post
how?
12 matches
Mail list logo
