[NTG-context] texlua fails on OSX-PPC

2009-03-24 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Hi ho, my formats were outdated, so I tried to update my "minimals" installation - got only an error. So I deleted the whole texmf tree and installed from scratch: neither --context=beta nor --context=current works (I deleted the --context=beta switch from first-setup.sh); looks like an error in th

Re: [NTG-context] texlua fails on OSX-PPC

2009-03-24 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
> dyld: Symbol not found: _close$UNIX2003 > Referenced from: /usr/local/ConTeXt/bin/texlua > Expected in: /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib Sorry, I updated the binaries, but compiled on 10.5 Intel; that's probably the problem. Can anyone compile OS X PPC binaries natively? Thomas? Arthur

Re: [NTG-context] texlua fails on OSX-PPC

2009-03-24 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Mar 24, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: Sorry, I updated the binaries, but compiled on 10.5 Intel; that's probably the problem. Can anyone compile OS X PPC binaries natively? Thomas? Arthur Yes, though - I compiled luatex from trunk yesterday and am experiencing pro

Re: [NTG-context] texlua fails on OSX-PPC

2009-03-24 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Mar 24, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: Sorry, I updated the binaries, but compiled on 10.5 Intel; that's probably the problem. Can anyone compile OS X PPC binaries natively? Thomas? Arthur Hi, I was just updating the binaries when the server at contextgarden went b

Re: [NTG-context] texlua fails on OSX-PPC

2009-03-24 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
2009/3/24 Arthur Reutenauer : >> dyld: Symbol not found: _close$UNIX2003 >>   Referenced from: /usr/local/ConTeXt/bin/texlua >>   Expected in: /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib > >  Sorry, I updated the binaries, but compiled on 10.5 Intel; that's > probably the problem.  Can anyone compile OS X PPC binar

Re: [NTG-context] texlua fails on OSX-PPC

2009-03-24 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
2009/3/24 Henning Hraban Ramm : > But at the moment rsync does nothing (no message at all), we had some > network problems before, I'll try to reboot Seems like some server processes are down on contextgarden.net - I can ping the garden, but neither http nor rsync respond. Greetlings, Hraban ___

Re: [NTG-context] texlua fails on OSX-PPC

2009-03-24 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Mar 24, 2009, at 2:07 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Mar 24, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: Sorry, I updated the binaries, but compiled on 10.5 Intel; that's probably the problem. Can anyone compile OS X PPC binaries natively? Thomas? Arthur Hi, I was just updati

Re: [NTG-context] texlua fails on OSX-PPC

2009-03-24 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Hello Thomas, On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 21:43, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > > If I interpret the messages from the build script correctly, my computer > managed to upload all binaries before the server died this afternoon: No. >>> pdftex SVN #534 is at the latest version already > >>> xetex SVN #820

Re: [NTG-context] texlua fails on OSX-PPC

2009-03-24 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
> What libraries come with Leopard by default? Tiger is able to compile > for 10.3, right? Leopard also has the libraries for 10.3, but you need to set some environment variables for them to be used. Arthur

Re: [NTG-context] texlua fails on OSX-PPC

2009-03-24 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Mar 24, 2009, at 10:43 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: This means that your version of LuaTeX is not any newer than the one already present in the binaries, so nothing gets compiled at all. You need to compile manually (stepping into the folder, running build.sh), copy the resulting binary to the

Re: [NTG-context] texlua fails on OSX-PPC

2009-03-25 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
> Hmm, but when I ran the script this morning, it compiled a lot of binaries > and tried to commit the new files; it got stuck somewhere in the svn > commit. Apparently you did indeed commit yesterday at 13:12, according to the log. Thanks for your efforts :-) Arthur

Re: [NTG-context] texlua fails on OSX-PPC

2009-03-25 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 22:56, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2009, at 10:43 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >> This means that your version of LuaTeX is not any newer than the one >> already present in the binaries, so nothing gets compiled at all. You >> need to compile manually (stepping in