On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>> And what would be the opposite?
>>
>> For example \startquote ... \stopquote
>> to something like {\MyQuote ... }
>
> AFAIK, there is no easy way to do this.
One can use \aftergroup trickery.
\def\MyQuote{\symbol[leftquote]\aftergroup\endMyQuote}
\de
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
>
> Am 13.08.2006 um 15:29 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
>
>> And what would be the opposite?
>>
>> For example \startquote ... \stopquote
>> to something like {MyQuote ... }
>>
>> Steffen
>
>
> \def\MyQuote#1{\startquote#1\stopquote}
>
> \MyQuote{something t
Am 13.08.2006 um 15:29 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
> And what would be the opposite?
>
> For example \startquote ... \stopquote
> to something like {MyQuote ... }
>
> Steffen
\def\MyQuote#1{\startquote#1\stopquote}
\MyQuote{something to be quoted}
... should work OK, right?
Steffen
__
> And what would be the opposite?
>
> For example \startquote ... \stopquote
> to something like {\MyQuote ... }
AFAIK, there is no easy way to do this.
Aditya
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-contex
Am 10.08.2006 um 22:47 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
> You can always define your own startstop.
>
> \definestartstop[italic][before={\bgroup \it},after={\egroup}]
>
> and then do
>
> \startitalic
> This is italic
> \stopitalic
>
> When a command takes an optional agrument, you can do use something
Thank you.
\footnote
\index
\chapter\section ...
\it \bf \sc \mr \cap
\language[...]
That would be quite a good start.
Steffen
Am 10.08.2006 um 22:44 schrieb Hans Hagen:
> Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> in XML and alike there is a concept of dedicated start/stop
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in XML and alike there is a concept of dedicated start/stop in
> formatting:
>
> ...
> ...
> ...
>
> But in ConTeXt/TeX we have always the same closing syntax "}". That
> makes reading the code not easier.
You can always define your own
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in XML and alike there is a concept of dedicated start/stop in
> formatting:
>
> ...
> ...
> ...
>
> But in ConTeXt/TeX we have always the same closing syntax "}". That
> makes reading the code not easier.
>
> Is there a workaround to define the closing mo
Hi,
in XML and alike there is a concept of dedicated start/stop in
formatting:
...
...
...
But in ConTeXt/TeX we have always the same closing syntax "}". That
makes reading the code not easier.
Is there a workaround to define the closing more precisely (like the
examples above),
so
