Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl writes:
anyhow, i've now defined then in a different way (ok, some more trickery
had to be applied as it's one of these aspects of open type math that
still inherits old stuff) so in a next version you can do this:
\setupmathstackers[vfenced][hoffset=10pt]
Tested
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl writes:
what you observe is the fact that we have a discrete number of sizes
till we run out of them and go stretchable
That makes sense.
anyhow, i've now defined then in a different way (ok, some more trickery
had to be applied as it's one of these aspects of open
On 7/10/2013 2:02 PM, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
In certain cases, display-mathunderbraces are not quite wide enough.
Here's a minimal example:
===
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
\underbrace{15\,\tf cm}_{L}
\stopformula
\stoptext
===
Using 2013.05.28 00:36
In certain cases, display-mathunderbraces are not quite wide enough.
Here's a minimal example:
===
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
\underbrace{15\,\tf cm}_{L}
\stopformula
\stoptext
===
Using 2013.05.28 00:36 MKIV (from vanilla TL2013), the left brace tip
On 2013–07–10 Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
In certain cases, display-mathunderbraces are not quite wide enough.
Here's a minimal example:
===
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
\underbrace{15\,\tf cm}_{L}
\stopformula
\stoptext
===
\starttext
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 02:13:28PM +0200, Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–07–10 Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
In certain cases, display-mathunderbraces are not quite wide enough.
Here's a minimal example:
===
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
\underbrace{15\,\tf
