David Arnold wrote:
Changing each occurrence of TEXMFMAIN in type-tmf.dat to
TEXMFMAIN,TEXMFTE,TEXMFGW produces the following result:
Quiz Four.tex texnansi-adobe-utopia.tex
QuizFour.auxtexnansi-bitstrea-charter.tex
QuizFour.log
David Arnold wrote:
Hans et al,
Changing each occurrence of TEXMFMAIN in type-tmf.dat to
TEXMFMAIN,TEXMFTE,TEXMFGW produces the following result:
At a first glance, that looked fine. But I still have to
catch up on a lot of e-mail ;-)
Taco
___
ntg
Hans et al,
Changing each occurrence of TEXMFMAIN in type-tmf.dat to
TEXMFMAIN,TEXMFTE,TEXMFGW produces the following result:
011-101:~/tmp davidarnold$ sudo texfont type-tmf-gw.dat
TeXFont 2.2.1 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 2000-2004
processing batch file : type-tmf-gw.dat
batch line
Adam Lindsay wrote:
Anyway, back to an earlier suggestion by Hans, --ro=TEXMFMAIN,TEXMFTE
seems to work for me, except in the case of Adobe Utopia. In that case,
--ro=TEXMFMAIN,TEXMFGW should work. Actually, I see the Utopia lines
replicated for tl2003+. Should it not be:
--ro=TEXMFMAIN,TEXMFGW,
Hans Hagen said this at Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:39:55 +0100:
>> batch line : --en=texnansi --ve=public --co=antp --
>> so=auto --ro=TEXMFMAIN
>
>are you sure that you replaced it?
It's weird. Looking through the rest of David's log, it replaced some of
them, but not all. I never claimed
David Arnold wrote:
Adam, Hans, Taco, et al,
Here's the result (GWTeX on Mac Tiger) of replacing TEXMFMAIN with
TEXMFTE:
011-101:~/tmp davidarnold$ texfont type-tmf-gw.dat
TeXFont 2.2.1 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 2000-2004
processing batch file : type-tmf-gw.dat
batch line : --en=
Adam, Hans, Taco, et al,
Here's the result (GWTeX on Mac Tiger) of replacing TEXMFMAIN with
TEXMFTE:
011-101:~/tmp davidarnold$ texfont type-tmf-gw.dat
TeXFont 2.2.1 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 2000-2004
processing batch file : type-tmf-gw.dat
batch line : --en=texnansi --ve=public -
Gerben Wierda wrote:
Are these "write" or "read" trees? If it is write, then my guess is the
default shoul dbe TEXMFLOCAL because officially that is the place where
local site modifications should go. That would also survive an upgrade or
install of TeX itself.
these are read trees; the wri
> Gerben Wierda wrote:
>
>>texfont and/or ConTeXt seems to be keyed to a certain distribution setup.
>>I would say that for ConTeXt that is ok (though as far as I know Hans
>>himself keeps the fonts in TEXMFFONTS or so, so he needs a specialized
>>type-tmf.dat as well). That the default is TeX Live
Gerben Wierda wrote:
texfont and/or ConTeXt seems to be keyed to a certain distribution setup.
I would say that for ConTeXt that is ok (though as far as I know Hans
himself keeps the fonts in TEXMFFONTS or so, so he needs a specialized
type-tmf.dat as well). That the default is TeX Live also see
Adam Lindsay wrote:
Gerben, Hans, can you think of a way to make this workaround unnecessary?
doesn't --fontroot=. work?
Hans
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> David,
>
> Sorry I've been quiet on this front. I've been busy with other, non-
> ConTeXt things for a while, and am in the process of re-engaging with it.
>
> In order to run type-tmf.dat, you need a way around the hard-coded --
> rootlist=TEXMFMAIN that's in the .dat file. gwTeX keeps the fonts
David,
Sorry I've been quiet on this front. I've been busy with other, non-
ConTeXt things for a while, and am in the process of re-engaging with it.
In order to run type-tmf.dat, you need a way around the hard-coded --
rootlist=TEXMFMAIN that's in the .dat file. gwTeX keeps the fonts we
need in
13 matches
Mail list logo