Malwarebytes for Business version 3 on clients.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Tom Miller
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 8:35 AM
To: NTSysADM@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] Ransonware protection
Hi All,
What would you recommend as
ccess Workstations:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/securing-privileged-access/privileged-access-workstations
https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/Privileged-Access-53a4673a
Kurt
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Katherine M. Moss
wrote:
> What are those again?
>
om [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 4:34 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer
over Linux?
Hey all,
Just had to ask this one. I’m really curious because I’ve heard the argument
ould
give consumers a warm fuzzy feeling :)
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss
Sent: 02 June 2017 18:12
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
?
It's also a push to start implementing PAWs - Protected Access Workstations -
which is how I'm going to configure my next machine.
Kurt
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Katherine M. Moss
wrote:
> I prefer remote management, actually. The insane thing is how easy it is to
> build
I've noticed it's more Windows 10 than older versions. I seriously wonder
whether this was done on purpose ...
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of James Rankin
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 12:23 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NT
people who refused to
adapt, this is technology we must learn.
Nano is new but Core has been around since Server 2008. I would not call that
new.
-Matt
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss
Sent
s.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss
Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 9:47 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: Nasty Outlook 2016 and Windows 10 issue
In light of the advice you guys provi
maybe you could say “Why use Linux when you can use Windows without the
overhead and security vulnerabilities that go with a GUI?”
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>]
bject: [NTSysADM] RE: Nasty Outlook 2016 and Windows 10 issue
They should be recreated for the proper contents of the new profile.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss
Sent: Thursday, Jun
o Windows
Shell... Core can run most (not all, but most) server loads.
Nano is a VERY restricted version of server. It cannot run most server loads.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss
Sent: Thursday, June
e.
DAMIEN SOLODOW
IT Engineering Lead
317.447.6033 (office)
HARRISON COLLEGE
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 4:34 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] What is the argument fo
Hey all,
Just had to ask this one. I'm really curious because I've heard the argument,
well, if you're going to run server Core, why not just use linux? What can you
say to make the conversation worthwhile and not just arguing preferences? Or is
that really what it's all about these days? Iv'e b
orth
checking the config.
What does the output between a working and a non-working desktop look like for
the outlook test e-mail auto configuration for the same account?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On B
sts.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 9:51 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: Nasty Outlook 2016 and Windows 10 issue
Now why did this not happen on my spare D630? And why did the D630 not h
s 10 issue
They should be recreated for the proper contents of the new profile.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 9:25 AM
To: ntsysadm@lis
e XML files (put them
in a different folder). They are used by Outlook 2016 to build the profile
instead of the PRF files that prior versions of Outlook used.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of
Hi all,
This might end up on the Exchange list, but until then, it looks like a
different issue. I have recently reinstalled Office 2016 in light of a crashing
Outlook when I went to set up this email address inside. Upon reinstall, I
created a new profile, (the "connect Outlook to Office 365" d
.com<mailto:ntshe...@gmail.com>
425-205-9047
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Katherine M. Moss
mailto:km...@winterhillsolutions.com>> wrote:
Thanks for that. I will definitely keep you guys updated.
Sent from Nine<http://www.9folders.com/>
From: &
549 8842
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Katherine M. Moss
mailto:km...@winterhillsolutions.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for some open minded folks on here who can possibly provide
validation for both sides of this argument. I tend to prefer storage spaces
simply because they ar
Hi all,
I'm looking for some open minded folks on here who can possibly provide
validation for both sides of this argument. I tend to prefer storage spaces
simply because they are so simple to configure and they don't require a set of
eyes to read BIOS screens. I know some people on the other ha
I think it all depends on their level of comfort with having a third party
manage everything for them.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of J- P
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 10:10 PM
To: NT
Subject: [NTSysADM] cloud service (VDI)
Hi all ,
l event, you will be notified
where to tune for additional details
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:48 AM, David McSpadden
mailto:dav...@imcu.com>> wrote:
Only a test?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<
listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>]
On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 8:41 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum
o: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Test
Hi Katherine,
I've been getting your emails via the list again. Were you able to determine
what the problem was?
--
Espi
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Katherine M. Moss
mailto:km...@winterhillsolutions.com>> wrote:
This is a test.
M] RE: Test
Only a test?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 8:41 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject
This is a test.
27 matches
Mail list logo
