In this instance you should set reservation or class options, see
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc958929.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc958929.aspxHave a look at
that and if you need any more help then come back to us. But I would urge
you to go this route rather
While I don't know all of your circumstances, it seems to me that
instead of trying to do funky things with DHCP, you'd be better off
re-architecting your network. Having two different exits from your
network segment seems a bit inefficient or confusing.
I understand that this might not be under
At the moment corporate let us use indipendent internet connection while all
other traffic is routed to a corporate wan router with proper DNS settings. So
I asked if , for just a couple of Cisco phones that need a tftserver option to
the wan, I could use some reserved addresses in the same
Oh, I'm sure it will work. It's not that it isn't *right*, it's that I
think it would be a bit less confusing if it were arranged a different
way. But, that does depend on your circumstances.
If you have a flat network - that is, not segmented at all, with no
router - then what you're setting up
How would you setup a machine to Authenticate to it's domain but use a
different dns from one that's used for authentication?
Joe Haralson
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Not sure I follow here. DNS isn't used for authentication. It's used to look up
names of servers which might authenticate it though. What's the
problem/scenario?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE)
Case Closed. I had a dns issue with primary dns box and secondary wasn't
configure right. Thanks anyway.
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2009 1:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2003 AD
