Not sure it's solution but I can at least try it. I found couple threads with
similar problems and seems that right now the workaround is to unmount volumes
for the reboot and remount them after the reboot. Our ESX admin is a little
reluctant right now to try out the mounting in RW mode and
Thanks for that, will take a look at that (and add it to the ever-expanding
list of bookmarks in Firefox Sync)
Cheers,
On 2 February 2011 01:54, Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologies for the delayed response. Have become self-employed and
buried with work (which is a very nice
4GB of E:, J:, L: drives all are logical disks. Raid 5 with their own
smart array controller. C: has no Pagefile but has the OS and it's own
Smart array controller.
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Posted At: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 1:52 PM
Posted To: itli...@imcu.com
We're using OpenDNS - the free edition blocks the content quite well,
and the other editions have some nice features. If you want reports of
who/which computer is trying to access inappropriate content, you'll
need to look elsewhere though.
Sean Rector, MCSE
-Original Message-
From:
We are setting up a remote desktop gateway server (that will be
front-ended by ISA Server) and need to get a certificate for it. For
the limited applications we have had in the past, we have been able to
get by with using self-signed certificates, so this is our first foray
into getting one from
The encrpytion is the same whether it's $10 or $1000, the level of
authentication changes i.e. you pay more, they check you really are Pitt
County etc.
The main thing is to ensure that whichever cert you choose, that the
devices that will connect to your server have the root CA installed.
Agreed. If it's for company use only, get the cheapest one you can and it
should work just fine. Godaddy certs are really inexpensive if you spend a
few minutes with your friend Google and find a coupon code.
There is one potential gotcha that I know of, no matter which vendor you
choose. If
We have one using Certificates for Exchange for $29.99 and it works fine.
-Original Message-
From: Mayo, Bill [mailto:bem...@pittcountync.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 8:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Basic/Standard Certificate ok?
We are setting up a remote desktop
I work in an old Museum here in the District. My runs are very long, one is
over 700 feet and gives me a problem every now and then. Is it worthwhile to
switch out our CAT45 and go to CAT6a (there is something above 6a?) All our
servers are gig but most of the workstations are not. All my
I have been trying to use EdgeSight For Load Testing v3.8 from Citrix to
stress test my new XenApp 6 farm, but I am finding the product a bit on the
flaky side (to say the least). Now I am not familiar with testing as a
process so it is a bit of a steep learning curve, but does anyone possibly
You're well in excess of the limit of Ethernet over twisted pair, regardless
of the cable used.
Runs should be limited to 100 meters in total (including patch cables).
Usually 90 meter run to allow 10 meters fo patch cables is the practice.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Holstrom, Don
700 *feet*?
You should be glad it works *part* of the time. Ethernet over twisted
pair copper is only rated for 100 meters (roughly 329 feet). Whether the
cable is CAT5, CAT5e, CAT6, CAT6a doesn't matter.
You really, really should run some fiber out to that location.
On 2/2/2011 9:40 AM,
Or stick some repeaters or a switch in between...
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Phil Brutsche p...@optimumdata.com wrote:
700 *feet*?
You should be glad it works *part* of the time. Ethernet over twisted
pair copper is only rated for 100 meters (roughly 329 feet). Whether the
cable is
Just curious, as it may be hard to run fiber in an old building, would it be
worth looking at powerline ethernet?
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Phil Brutsche p...@optimumdata.com wrote:
700 *feet*?
You should be glad it works *part* of the time. Ethernet over twisted
pair copper is only
If you can run copper you can run fiber.
I have no experience with current powerline ethernet gear.
I have some cheap 5-year-old consumer gear that is most certainly NOT
worth. The D-Link crap I have won't even come close to 100Mbit, much
less gigabit.
On 2/2/2011 9:54 AM, Lee Douglas wrote:
Folks,
I recently upgraded my BES 4.1.7 to 5 SP1 MR1 on new hardware. AD
authentication does not work expect for the accounts I added when I installed
the software.
Lots about this on the web but I have not been able to resolve this. I've
already called support and have an open case.
Sorry for the late reply. How are your TCP Chimney settings configured on
these boxes? This sounds like it could be a related issue.
-Bonnie
From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:cgarciamo...@spragueenergy.com]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 10:39 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Holstrom, Don dholst...@nbm.org wrote:
I work in an old Museum here in the District. My runs are very long, one is
over 700 feet and gives me a problem every now and then. Is it worthwhile to
switch out our CAT45 and go to CAT6a (there is something above 6a?)
I have seen this issue myself with my RDS servers and haven't taken time to
resolve it yet. Some forums suggest this pause happens one when another user is
logging on and disabling the print spooler resolves the issue.
Dave
From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu]
Sent:
Could be anything up to entire big applications. Doing a rollout at such a
distributed site with actual engineers running around with a disc is a real
pain for this client, so we're trying to leverage the Internet as much as
possible.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Jonathan Link
Without trying to stir up a debate on networking... I agree with everything
that has been mentioned here with one exception. You can run gigabit over
CAT5 cabling if it has been installed properly.
See
http://www.gigabit-ethernet.org/technology/whitepapers/gige_1098/copper.html
#base
I have a
I have some things to add to that:
a) My experience is that potential fiber distances are fairly standard,
regardless of the manufacturer.
b) Do not try to put ethernet on CAT3 unless you are REALLY deperate. It
will *hypothetically* work, but it is out of spec. Since it is out of
spec do not
Wow, now I saw in the news a record cyclone hitting the Aussie coast … you
still safe and sound ?
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
From: James Hill [mailto:james.h...@superamart.com.au]
Sent: Monday,
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Phil Brutsche p...@optimumdata.com wrote:
Fiber can go longer still. How long depends on the type and grade
of fiber. Exact numbers seem to vary by manufacturer.
a) My experience is that potential fiber distances are fairly standard,
regardless of the
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Art DeKneef art.dekn...@cox.net wrote:
Without trying to stir up a debate on networking... I agree with everything
that has been mentioned here with one exception. You can run gigabit over
CAT5 cabling if it has been installed properly.
The differences in distance limitations for fiber has to do with the type of
fiber (example - Multimode, versus Single mode), and the transceivers on each
end. SX, versus LX (Short Haul versus Long Haul). You generally cannot mix and
match LX or SX transceivers without a special cable. Cisco
As it was explained way back then by a Fluke engineer and as I try to
remember it correctly your understanding is correct. There were minor
differences in some companies cabling between 5 and 5e. The main difference
was in the specs between the two. His demo included a couple of their
cabling
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
jra...@eaglemds.com wrote:
The differences in distance limitations for fiber has to do with the type of
fiber (example
- Multimode, versus Single mode) ...
Right. Also the grade of fiber -- apparently, not all fiber is
created equal;
Aside: HP has some of the most atrocious URLs I've ever seen.
+1000
FYI, I believe it's called a mode conditioning cable
Yes, you would be correct. I drew a blank when I was typing earlier.
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
The only thing worse than HP's URLs is their search capability on their
site[1].
[1] I admit I may be a few years out of date here...I haven't tried
searching the HP site in a long time.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle jra...@eaglemds.com
wrote:
Aside: HP has some of
(Aside: HP has some of the most atrocious URLs I've ever seen.)
Cisco's are worse. IMHO.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 4:44 PM
You are a very lucky man. I had to find the latest EVA DSM yesterday. It
was not fun.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
The only thing worse than HP's URLs is their search capability on their
site[1].
[1] I admit I may be a few years out of date
HP's knowledge base has really slipped in the last couple of years, at least in
the UNIX areas. It's riddled with dead links and supported by just a handful
of people. Even their documentation has become less informative. I perceive
it as an attempt to push their training classes.
From:
Does anyone know of a system I can telnet into enough to see that port 25 is
open? According to our soon-to-be-new Exchange host they have whitelisted our
IP to hit port 25 but we care getting connect failed.
Any open relays someplace I can test?
Dave
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security
We are still using a now expiring Novell ichain server for external access. I
am looking for a replacement.
This somewhat cool software (no longer being upgraded) did the following for me.
1) Reverse proxy
2) Single signon tools
3) Works with RSA SecureID (Radius).
4) URL Rewriting
5) Caching
6)
HAHAHAHAHA.
No.
However, if you want to test, from your Exchange server you can just
telnet to port 25 by name or IP address of the MX of one of your
customers or vendors.
If you want, follow this recipe:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/153119
Set up the email conversation in notepad, copy
I agree with Bonnie, sounds like TCP Chimney related issue.
Thanks
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://dabcc.com/Webster http://dabcc.com/Webster
From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:cgarciamo...@spragueenergy.com]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011
Agreed. And that's why I don't search their site anymore...
*ASB *(Find me online via About.Me http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker/bio)
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...
*
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
The only thing worse than
Why would I want training from people who lack documentation skills?
*ASB *(Find me online via About.Me http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker/bio)
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...
*
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote:
HP’s knowledge base
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:28 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
Does anyone know of a system I can telnet into
enough to see that port 25 is open?
Are you looking to test to see if you can reach other MXes from your
MX, or to see if other MXes can reach your MX?
If the former, just
I don't think you understand what I'm saying because I mostly agree with
everything you've said here as well as most of Andrew's points. I also agree
with Marcus's dumb ideas.
I'm not saying that whitelisting is bad or pointless. I'm not saying that
blacklisting is better. Nor am I saying
41 matches
Mail list logo
