Anyone home?
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
Just us chickens
-Original Message-
From: Osborne, Richard [mailto:richard.osbo...@wth.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 9:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: test
Anyone home?
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
Dave's not here!
John W. Cook
System Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
5950 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, Fl 32607
Office (352) 244-1610
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
-Original Message-
From: Osborne, Richard
I just resubscribed and received your message.
Roger Wright
___
Polarvoid: The state of having no baby pictures, a condition that usually
befalls the second-born child.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Osborne, Richard
richard.osbo...@wth.orgwrote:
Anyone home?
~ Finally, powerful
Yes, it seems to be very quiet this week on the list.
Donald Bittenbender
Software Developer
GFI Software - www.gfi.com
Tel.: +1 866 389 5597 ext 6065Mob.: +1 727 748 2708
-Original Message-
From: Osborne, Richard [mailto:richard.osbo...@wth.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011
No, man, I'm Dave, man!
-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 9:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: test
Dave's not here!
John W. Cook
System Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
5950 NW 1st Place
I am...
2011/12/28 John C Owen jo...@innovativefoto.com
Just us chickens
-Original Message-
From: Osborne, Richard [mailto:richard.osbo...@wth.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 9:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: test
Anyone home?
~ Finally, powerful endpoint
And slow. My reply took about 10 minutes.
John W. Cook
System Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
5950 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, Fl 32607
Office (352) 244-1610
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
-Original Message-
From: Donald Bittenbender
Who?
John W. Cook
System Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
5950 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, Fl 32607
Office (352) 244-1610
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
-Original Message-
From: David Mazzaccaro
Without an e-mail from the list every 30 minutes or so I start to worry
that my Internet e-mail isn't working!
-Original Message-
From: Donald Bittenbender [mailto:donald.bittenben...@gfi.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 8:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: test
Yes,
Everything works, it's just quiet...
Warm regards,
Stu
-Original Message-
From: Osborne, Richard [mailto:richard.osbo...@wth.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 9:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: test
Anyone home?
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a
No, I'm at work.
-Original Message-
From: Osborne, Richard [mailto:richard.osbo...@wth.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 8:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: test
Anyone home?
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Bueller? Bueller? anyone?
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:24 AM, John C Owen jo...@innovativefoto.comwrote:
Just us chickens
-Original Message-
From: Osborne, Richard [mailto:richard.osbo...@wth.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 9:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: test
Thought I'd throw out a probably-rather-OT question on an App-V issue I am
having
My tests have been with one app, published to one XenApp server using
direct addresses for one of the management servers and one of the streaming
servers. Publishing is via management servers, streaming is via
Have you checked out Tim Mangan's AppV Troubleshooter tool?
http://www.tmurgent.com/appvirt/FTL/Ftl.aspx
BTW, I had no idea that Microsoft made SilverLight available on the Mac.
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.comhttp://www.carlwebster.com/
I will give that a blast and bookmark for future reference, cheers!
On 28 December 2011 15:58, Webster webs...@carlwebster.com wrote:
Have you checked out Tim Mangan's AppV Troubleshooter tool?
http://www.tmurgent.com/appvirt/FTL/Ftl.aspx
BTW, I had no idea that Microsoft made SilverLight
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Osborne, Richard
richard.osbo...@wth.org wrote:
Without an e-mail from the list every 30 minutes or so I start to worry
that my Internet e-mail isn't working!
You can check the list archives for activity using the below link,
which is conveniently included at
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:45 AM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote:
Yes, it seems to be very quiet this week on the list.
And slow. My reply took about 10 minutes.
At what point does that cease to be called slow and just become
regular speed for Friggin' Lyris? ;-)
-- Ben
~ Finally,
Quiet like the market all over the western world
Guido Elia
HELPPC - HELPPC SERVICE
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:s...@sunbelt-software.com]
Inviato: mercoledì 28 dicembre 2011 16.01
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: test
Everything works, it's just quiet...
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed the same quiet, but figured it was just the usual
inter-holiday week disinterest.
I will note that mail is definitely still flowing, as I got
eleventy-billion out-of-office responses to the above post.
(Yes,
Home just catching up on emails ;)
From: Kim Longenbaugh k...@colonialsavings.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 9:21 AM
Subject: RE: test
No, I'm at work.
-Original Message-
So I know that the AD attribute UserAccountControl is the sum of the
values of 21 different values (i.e., so a value of 546 = 2+32+512,
which is composed of the sum of the constants ACCOUNT_DISABLED,
PASSWORD_NOT_REQUIRED, and NORMAL_ACCOUNT). But how do I break that
down in Powershell? For
You might be over-engineering the solution. :)
Try this to get a list of disabled users: Get-ADUser -Filter {enabled -eq
$false}
DAMIEN SOLODOW
Systems Engineer
317.447.6033 (office)
317.447.6014 (fax)
HARRISON COLLEGE
-Original Message-
From: Michael Leone
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Damien Solodow
damien.solo...@harrison.edu wrote:
You might be over-engineering the solution. :)
Try this to get a list of disabled users: Get-ADUser -Filter {enabled -eq
$false}
I don't want a list of all disabled users, tho. I just need to figure
out if the
Here is the theory for building a bit-wise search:
###
### We need to scan through all users.
###
### We need to find those user's who:
### Are normal users 0x0200 ADS_UF_NORMAL_ACCOUNT
### Are not disabled 0x0002 ADS_UF_ACCOUNTDISABLE
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Michael Leone oozerd...@gmail.com wrote:
So I know that the AD attribute UserAccountControl is the sum of the
values of 21 different values (i.e., so a value of 546 = 2+32+512,
which is composed of the sum of the constants ACCOUNT_DISABLED,
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
Do a bitwise AND between the candidate user's value and ACCOUNT_DISABLED.
I'm only on page 143 of PowerShell in Action, and haven't gotten
to bitwise operators yet, but Google results suggest this should work:
if
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Michael Leone oozerd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
Do a bitwise AND between the candidate user's value and ACCOUNT_DISABLED.
I'm only on page 143 of PowerShell in Action, and haven't gotten
to
A PropertyValueCollection has to be changed to an Int32. For a singleton like
userAccountControl, it will typically be something like:
$uac = $user.Properties.userAccountControl.Item( 0 )
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Michael Leone oozerd...@gmail.com wrote:
if ($User.userAccountControl -band $ADS_UF_NORMAL_ACCOUNT )
The '-band' operator failed: Cannot convert the
System.DirectoryServices.PropertyValueCollection value of type
I wish there was a standard for automatic replies somewhere in the email
spec. There's a lot of hidden header data, can't all the email clients just
agree to make a X-HEADER-AUTOMATIC-REPLY=TRUE or something, so Lyris can easily
just filter this stuff to the bit bucket?
There I go,
Better than pipe bombing...
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Matthew W. Ross
mr...@ephrataschools.orgwrote:
I wish there was a standard for automatic replies somewhere in the email
spec. There's a lot of hidden header data, can't all the email clients just
agree to make a
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Matthew W. Ross
mr...@ephrataschools.org wrote:
I wish there was a standard for automatic replies somewhere in the email
spec.
There is. Machine-generated messages should be sent to the envelope
sender (SMTP reverse path), not the RFC-822 From: sender. If
Maybe.
Pipe bombs sometimes work...
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 13:20, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Better than pipe bombing...
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Matthew W. Ross mr...@ephrataschools.org
wrote:
I wish there was a standard for automatic replies somewhere in the
I know why this is done, and we could discuss it until I was blue in the face
and got irritated; but long story short - it ain't gonna change in Exchange.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott
And it's why I always mark them as spam, for both personal and work
email - because Exchange is broken in that regard, and it's the only
way I have to avoid the problem.
Kurt
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 14:12, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
I know why this is done, and we could
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
I know why this is done ...
Can you explain why, then? If there was a good reason, perhaps
people would be less critical.
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
They never hit Lyris. When a list message hits someone with OoO set,
Exchange sends the auto-response directly to the address in the From:
header, i.e., the person who sent the message.
Maybe I don't know how Lyris does it, but most mail servers send a reply to
address of the list... So
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Matthew W. Ross
mr...@ephrataschools.org wrote:
They never hit Lyris. When a list message hits someone with OoO
set, Exchange sends the auto-response directly to the address in the
From: header, i.e., the person who sent the message.
Maybe I don't know how
No, I'm out and about ...
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
-Original Message-
From: Osborne, Richard [mailto:richard.osbo...@wth.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 9:22 AM
To: NT System Admin
40 matches
Mail list logo
